> Is there anything I can/should do in order to re-target this bug? Sorry, I’m
> a very green newbie
> in this low-level linux environment…
No, MJT already forwarded it to upstream (qemu)
It turns out to be a known, but not yet fixed kernel bug [1]
I've collected all the pointers that I could fin
Control: forwarded -1 https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=209831
Thanks,
/mjt
Hi @Christian,
thank you for confirming this bug. The cat /proc/stat looks in my case very
similar:
cat /proc/stat
cpu 2116591 89 8538907 52753423 221163 0 36382 0 0 0
cpu0 265391 6 1076646 6580691 28424 0 3086 0 0 0
cpu1 263929 2 1063789 6585041 28533 0 17611 0 0 0
cpu2 266378 4 1071775 658884
Control: forwarded -1
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2021-04/msg00732.html
Thanks,
/mjt
This made me wonder:
> In the stock linux kernel, as far as I can see, there's no counting for this
> info for x86
> architecture, - it is only counted for ia64, powerpc and s390x architectures.
And for [1] account_guest_time it indeed seems that way.
But while ia64/s390/powerpc have special cod
5 matches
Mail list logo