Bug#984573: systemd: backport support for SYSTEMD_SECCOMP to Buster

2021-03-05 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 05.03.21 um 13:10 schrieb Luca Boccassi: Control: tags -1 -moreinfo On Fri, 2021-03-05 at 12:56 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: Control: fixed -1 247-1 Control: tags -1 + moreinfo Am 05.03.21 um 11:49 schrieb Luca Boccassi: Package: systemd Version: 241-7~deb10u6 Tags: buster Dear Maintainer(

Bug#984573: systemd: backport support for SYSTEMD_SECCOMP to Buster

2021-03-05 Thread Luca Boccassi
Control: tags -1 -moreinfo On Fri, 2021-03-05 at 12:56 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: > Control: fixed -1 247-1 > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo > > Am 05.03.21 um 11:49 schrieb Luca Boccassi: > > Package: systemd > > Version: 241-7~deb10u6 > > Tags: buster > > > > Dear Maintainer(s), > > > > Since g

Bug#984573: systemd: backport support for SYSTEMD_SECCOMP to Buster

2021-03-05 Thread Michael Biebl
Control: fixed -1 247-1 Control: tags -1 + moreinfo Am 05.03.21 um 11:49 schrieb Luca Boccassi: Package: systemd Version: 241-7~deb10u6 Tags: buster Dear Maintainer(s), Since glibc 2.33 faccessat() is implemented via faccessat2(), which is breaking running containers that use such version of g

Bug#984573: systemd: backport support for SYSTEMD_SECCOMP to Buster

2021-03-05 Thread Luca Boccassi
Package: systemd Version: 241-7~deb10u6 Tags: buster Dear Maintainer(s), Since glibc 2.33 faccessat() is implemented via faccessat2(), which is breaking running containers that use such version of glibc under systemd-nspawn in Buster. This is because faccessat2 is not in the "known" seccomp set