On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 02:43:03PM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
>...
> On Thu, 2021-02-18 at 07:16 -0800, tony mancill wrote:
>...
> > It seems that a local sbuild in a clean chroot doesn't set the
> > environment the same way that reproducible-builds.org does, as
> > 4.17.0-1
> > builds correct
Control: close -1 4.18.0-1
On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 07:16:37AM -0800, tony mancill wrote:
>...
> It seems that a local sbuild in a clean chroot doesn't set the
> environment the same way that reproducible-builds.org does, as 4.17.0-1
> builds correctly in that environment. But that's a separate co
Hi Tony,
On Thu, 2021-02-18 at 07:16 -0800, tony mancill wrote:
> > Tags: ftbfs
> > Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully
> > in the past)
>
> Hi Ritesh,
>
> It seems that a local sbuild in a clean chroot doesn't set the
> environment the same way that reproducible-bu
On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 09:38:16PM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> Source: swt4-gtk
> Version: 4.17.0-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: ftbfs
> Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
Hi Ritesh,
It seems that a local sbuild in a clean chroot doesn't set the
en
Source: swt4-gtk
Version: 4.17.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
Dear Maintainer,
During a rebuild of the package on a Bullseye based derivate, it is
found that the package fails to build. From the build failure log, i
5 matches
Mail list logo
