Bug#982601: python3-paraview Conflicts: python3-vtk9

2024-08-08 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
Hello, I am the facet-analyser maintainer/upstream (support) If fact the conflict comes from facet-analyser -> libinsighttoolkit5-dev -> lib-vtk9-dev -> python3-vtk9 facet analyser which is a PV plugins depends also on paraview-dev. facet-analyser -> paraview-dev -> conflict with python3-vt

Bug#982601: python3-paraview Conflicts: python3-vtk9

2024-05-19 Thread Drew Parsons
Package: paraview Version: 5.11.2+dfsg-6+b9 Followup-For: Bug #982601 X-Debbugs-Cc: Petter Reinholdtsen Petter, paraview might never be aligned with vtk. See https://gitlab.kitware.com/paraview/paraview/-/issues/18751 If facet-analyser needs to be able to work with either (both) python3-paravie

Bug#982601: python3-paraview Conflicts: python3-vtk9

2024-05-09 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
Control: affects -1 + facet-analyser Control: block 1040334 by -1 [Alastair McKinstry 2021-02-12] > Especially as I plan on getting paraview back working with the normal > python3-vtk9 > for the next release. Any idea when this will happen? This Conflicts make facet-analyser unbuildable, see ht

Bug#982601: python3-paraview Conflicts: python3-vtk9

2021-02-12 Thread Alastair McKinstry
python3-paraview has just been given Conflicts: python3-vtk9, which is a little confusing. Does it mean python3-paraview replaces python3-vtk9? Or should not python3-paraview not be used at all? (obviously there are other packages which use vtk via python). For this release, p

Bug#982601: python3-paraview Conflicts: python3-vtk9

2021-02-12 Thread Drew Parsons
Package: python3-paraview Version: 5.9.0-2 Severity: normal python3-paraview has just been given Conflicts: python3-vtk9, which is a little confusing. Does it mean python3-paraview replaces python3-vtk9? Or should not python3-paraview not be used at all? (obviously there are other packages which