Bug#979101: Legally problematic GPL-3+ readline dependency

2022-04-27 Thread Bastian Germann
On Mon, 18 Oct 2021 14:17:22 -0300 Carlos Henrique Lima Melara wrote: Hi, Bastian. On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 12:44:18PM +0200, Bastian Germann wrote: > I see that upstream included your patch to deal with this. Can you please > include that in the package and change the build dependency? I am ha

Bug#979101: Legally problematic GPL-3+ readline dependency

2021-10-12 Thread Bastian Germann
Control: severity On Thu, 7 Jan 2021 18:45:14 -0300 Carlos Henrique Lima Melara wrote: I would rather first solve this problem in the upstream instead of dealing with it in the packaging. Hi Carlos, I see that upstream included your patch to deal with this. Can you please include that in t

Bug#979101: Legally problematic GPL-3+ readline dependency

2021-01-08 Thread Francesco Poli
On Thu, 7 Jan 2021 18:45:14 -0300 Carlos Henrique Lima Melara wrote: > Hi, folks. Hello Carlos. > > I'm the new maintainer of devtodo and would appreciate an assistance of the > debian-legal on the license matter. As noted, devtodo is licensed under > GPL-2 only, although there is no boilerplat

Bug#979101: Legally problematic GPL-3+ readline dependency

2021-01-02 Thread Bastian Germann
Package: devtodo Severity: important This package depends on libreadline8 which is GPL-3+ licensed. According to debian/copyright parts of your package are GPL-2-only licensed. If that is also (transitively) the case for the binaries that link with libreadline.so.8 it might be legally problema