Bug#979100: Legally problematic GPL-3+ readline dependency

2021-10-09 Thread Bastian Germann
On Sat, 9 Oct 2021 16:04:33 -0600 Ross Vandegrift wrote: Upstream relicensed the client source to GPL v2 or later in 27e37a50 specifically to address this issue [1]. That change was released in 1.10, but d/copyright does not reflect it. I've opened an MR with the fix at [2], but need a sponsor

Bug#979100: Legally problematic GPL-3+ readline dependency

2021-10-09 Thread Ross Vandegrift
Control: tags -1 pending Hello, On Sat, 2 Jan 2021 18:47:07 +0100 Bastian Germann wrote: > This package depends on libreadline8 which is GPL-3+ licensed. According > to debian/copyright parts of your package are GPL-2-only licensed. If > that is also (transitively) the case for the binaries tha

Bug#979100: Legally problematic GPL-3+ readline dependency

2021-10-06 Thread Bastian Germann
Severity: serious On Sat, 2 Jan 2021 18:47:07 +0100 Bastian Germann wrote: This package depends on libreadline8 which is GPL-3+ licensed. According to debian/copyright parts of your package are GPL-2-only licensed. If that is also (transitively) the case for the binaries that link with libread

Bug#979100: Legally problematic GPL-3+ readline dependency

2021-01-02 Thread Bastian Germann
Package: connman Severity: important This package depends on libreadline8 which is GPL-3+ licensed. According to debian/copyright parts of your package are GPL-2-only licensed. If that is also (transitively) the case for the binaries that link with libreadline.so.8 it might be legally problema