On Thu 2020-12-24 09:37:46 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>> thanks for the diagnosis, Joey! this looks like a change between the
>> ctypes module between python 3.8 and 3.9. I'll fix it in python3-xdo,
>> and hopefully that will resolve your problem.
>
> Independent of gett
Control: affects 976637 + impass python3-xdo
I just noticed #976637 after working on resolving #977894 in
impass/python3-xdo.
I'm working around the problem by using "c" instead of "libc" in libxdo,
but just wanted to note the relationship between the two issues in the
BTS.
--dkg
signa
Control: forwarded 977894 https://bugs.python.org/issue42580
On Thu 2020-12-24 08:24:19 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> thanks for the diagnosis, Joey! this looks like a change between the
> ctypes module between python 3.8 and 3.9. I'll fix it in python3-xdo,
> and hopefully that will resol
Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> thanks for the diagnosis, Joey! this looks like a change between the
> ctypes module between python 3.8 and 3.9. I'll fix it in python3-xdo,
> and hopefully that will resolve your problem.
Independent of getting this fixed, I think it's concerning that ctypes
falls b
Control: reassign 977894 python3-xdo
Control: affects 977894 + impass
Control: severity critical
Control: retitle 977894 python3-xdo: fails with python3.9 due to bad libc
linkage
thanks for the diagnosis, Joey! this looks like a change between the
ctypes module between python 3.8 and 3.9. I'll
Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> I'm seeing comparable weird behavior, including the invocations of
> ldconfig and gcc, even if i don't see your particular failure. yikes.
> But, a simple file like this produces the same behavior (with ldconfig
> and gcc):
>
> ~~~
> #!/usr/bin/python3
> import xdo
>
Control: affects 977894 python3-xdo
On Wed 2020-12-23 15:50:43 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Ok, this is super weird, and I'm afraid also likely a security hole.
ugh, thanks for digging around on this with us, Joey.
it looks to me like the liblibc.a business is happening due to gobject
introspection
Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
> Hey, Joey. Sorry you're having trouble. What is the error when you try
> to execute "impass gui"? It should pop up a small context dialog
> window. That winodw is not appearing? Is there a python exception?
No gui. All I see it the output I pasted.
> What does
Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> this is odd, and it makes me think that there's some python module path
> failure happening. if it can't find the system xdo, maybe it also can't
> find the gobject introspection libraries that are used to interface with
> GTK?
>
> is it possible that this is being ru
On Tue 2020-12-22 10:13:43 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> I do have that recommends installed. I did try to reinstall
> it in case it was somehow broken. Real problem is that the gui does
> not appear, I don't know if that's due to whatever the problem
> is with python3-xdo.
this is odd, and it makes m
On Tue, Dec 22 2020, Joey Hess wrote:
> Package: impass
> Version: 0.12.2-1
> Severity: normal
>
>> impass gui
> The xdo module is not found, so the 'xdo' paste method is not available.
> Please install python3-xdo.
> - exit 1
>
> I do have that recommends installed. I did try to reinstall
> it in
Package: impass
Version: 0.12.2-1
Severity: normal
> impass gui
The xdo module is not found, so the 'xdo' paste method is not available.
Please install python3-xdo.
- exit 1
I do have that recommends installed. I did try to reinstall
it in case it was somehow broken. Real problem is that the gui
12 matches
Mail list logo
