Bug#976887: texlive-base: Should not migrate to testing for now.

2020-12-17 Thread Norbert Preining
clone 976887 -1 reassign -1 texlive-formats-extra retitle -1 jadetex does not work with newer latex kernel block 976887 -1 thanks Cloning and reassigning the bug. Fix is prepared and uploaded after bug number assigned. Thanks On Wed, 09 Dec 2020, Hilmar Preusse wrote: > Package: texlive-base > V

Bug#976887: texlive-base: Should not migrate to testing for now.

2020-12-17 Thread Norbert Preining
Hi Hilmar, I pushed a fix to jadetex (texlive-extra source package) for compatibility with new LaTeX kernel. We should try to test whether it actually works. Best Norbert -- PREINING Norbert https://www.preining.info Accelia Inc. + IFMGA ProGuide + TU Wien + JAIST

Bug#976887: texlive-base: Should not migrate to testing for now.

2020-12-09 Thread Norbert Preining
On Thu, 10 Dec 2020, Hilmar Preuße wrote: > Hence I'd assume the issue is in some changes in the LaTeX kernel. Testing > has "LaTeX2e <2020-02-02> patch level 5" unstable is "LaTeX2e <2020-10-01> > patch level 2". Thanks, I will forward this to the LaTeX Team for check. Having a minimal example he

Bug#976887: texlive-base: Should not migrate to testing for now.

2020-12-09 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Am 09.12.2020 um 00:07 teilte Hilmar Preusse mit: Hi Norbert, The new texlive-base has an impact on docbook based documentations, see If you intend to work on this: attached is what I call a minimal xml file. The file can be processed using "docbook2tex test.xml" to get the tex source code.

Bug#976887: texlive-base: Should not migrate to testing for now.

2020-12-08 Thread Hilmar Preusse
Package: texlive-base Version: 2020.20201203-2 Severity: serious Dear Maintainer, The new texlive-base has an impact on docbook based documentations, see https://bugs.debian.org/976475 https://bugs.debian.org/976508 https://bugs.debian.org/976519 https://bugs.debian.org/976535 https://bugs.debia