On 11/19/20 3:39 PM, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> POCL built against LLVM 10 (sid) or LLVM 11 (experimental) causes a
> autopkgtest regression on armhf in libgpuarray while it succeeded with
> LLVM 9.
I finally managed to create a plain c reproducer (based on some pocl
test) which dies with this ba
On 11/19/20 11:20 PM, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote:
> This isn't testable in a qemu-armhf chroot, as pocl doesn't work there.
It works for me in a armhf pbuilder chroot driven via qemu-user-static
on an amd64 host.
Trying to reproduce on abel.d.o, a real armhf porterbox:
* install in the chroot:
(libgpuarray maintainer)
This isn't testable in a qemu-armhf chroot, as pocl doesn't work there.
Do all the non-clblas tests pass? (This can be checked by uninstalling
libclblas-dev then running the tests - this will "error" the clblas
tests but should at least not crash them.)
On 19/11/202
POCL built against LLVM 10 (sid) or LLVM 11 (experimental) causes a
autopkgtest regression on armhf in libgpuarray while it succeeded with
LLVM 9.
https://ci.debian.net/packages/libg/libgpuarray/testing/armhf/
(The autopkgtest cannot be run in pure testing due to missing RC-buggy
libclblas, it on
Control: tag -1 upstream fixed-upstream
seems to be fixed upstream, but no new release yet
Andreas
Package: pocl
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
As part of the effort to limit the number of llvm packages in the
archive, please upgrade to -11.
Thanks,
Sylvestre
6 matches
Mail list logo
