> Please talk to us, how we can help in making DOSBox Staging packaged
> on Debian?
> Cheers,
> Patryk Obara
Dear Patryk,
I am not an expert on Debian Policy, or a Debian Developer, just a passerby who
is also interested in getting dosbox-staging into Debian.
One issue I can see with porting
On Thu, 05 Nov 2020 21:52:10 + Ben Hutchings < b...@decadent.org.uk
> wrote: > DOSBox seems to be under active development even though it
hasn't had a > release for a while. So this is an independent fork,
not a successor > to a dead project. (If DOSBox had become dead upstream,
I wou
On 1.04.2023 16:57, Zuhair al-Mrayyed wrote:
Why do we need both rather than upgrading dosbox? Is this package
supposed to take over the existing binary package eventually?
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
some games are buggy in dosbox but run fine in dosbox-staging,
CyberMage: Darklight Awakening,
On Thu, 5 Nov 2020 19:37:39 +0100 Philipp Kern
wrote:
> On 05.11.20 17:41, David Heidelberg wrote:
> > Package: wnpp
> > Severity: wishlist
> > Owner: David Heidelberg
> > X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
> >
> > * Package name : dosbox-staging
> > Version : 0.76
> > Up
Any progress on this?
On Fri, 2020-11-06 at 17:55 +0100, David Heidelberg wrote:
> Hello Ben,
>
> I asked about possibility of changing name and the final reply is [1].
>
> Quoting dreamer:
> Right now, we are fighting to convince users (and developers) to move
> on from using a myriad of tiny DOSBox forks (link - ve
On 06/11/2020 17:55, David Heidelberg wrote:
Hello Ben,
I asked about possibility of changing name and the final reply is [1].
You managed to quote me before I wrote it myself here :) I will
also add the first sentence from my post:
> No, we are not open for changing the project name *at this
Hello Ben,
I asked about possibility of changing name and the final reply is [1].
Quoting dreamer:
Right now, we are fighting to convince users (and developers) to move
on from using a myriad of tiny DOSBox forks (link - very incomplete,
there are ~50 other dead forks I know of) or maintain th
On Thu, 2020-11-05 at 17:41 +0100, David Heidelberg wrote:
[...]
> Q: why is this package useful/relevant?
> A: Sucessor of DOSBox, which is already inside Debian
[...]
DOSBox seems to be under active development even though it hasn't had a
release for a while. So this is an independent fork, not
Hello Philipp,
I've been watching DOSBox development for long time and it seems their
progress is very slow, with limited number of SVN commits, not yet
merged SDL 2 support and no releases it doesn't seems it will thrive in
future.
As I understood DOSBox Staging was originally meant as a in
On 05.11.20 17:41, David Heidelberg wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: David Heidelberg
> X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
>
> * Package name: dosbox-staging
> Version : 0.76
> Upstream Author : The DOSBox Staging Team
> * URL : https://dos
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: David Heidelberg
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: dosbox-staging
Version : 0.76
Upstream Author : The DOSBox Staging Team
* URL : https://dosbox-staging.github.io/
* License : GPL-2.0-or-later
12 matches
Mail list logo
