On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 9:23 PM Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 08:54:22PM +0100, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
> > Thanks for possibly the best solution. Meanwhile OpenSSL 1.1.1h-1
> > migrated to testing; closing this bug report.
>
> That is not a fix. Fetchmail should not be che
On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 08:54:22PM +0100, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 6, 2020 at 9:09 AM Michal Palenik wrote:
> > for those stumbling on this via searching, the workaround mentioned
> > above is:
> [...]
> > apt -t unstable install libssl1.1:amd64
> Thanks for possibly the best
On Mon, 2 Nov 2020 10:34:35 +0100 Timo van Roermund
wrote:
> On Sun, 01 Nov 2020 14:25:03 -0800 Bill Wohler wrote:
>
> > Thanks for explaining the situation. Sounds like just some bad luck.
> > Even so, it would still be good if a mechanism could be created that
> > would prevent this from h
On Sun, 01 Nov 2020 14:25:03 -0800 Bill Wohler wrote:
> Thanks for explaining the situation. Sounds like just some bad luck.
> Even so, it would still be good if a mechanism could be created that
> would prevent this from happening in the future.
Yes, some mechanism to prevent this would be goo
Thanks for explaining the situation. Sounds like just some bad luck.
Even so, it would still be good if a mechanism could be created that
would prevent this from happening in the future.
I appreciate your sending the link to the prior package. It made it much
easier to go back, and now my mail is
On Sun, Nov 1, 2020 at 1:57 PM Klaumi Klingsporn wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Nov 2020 08:22:27 +0100
> =?UTF-8?B?TMOhc3psw7MgQsO2c3rDtnJtw6lueWkgKEdDUyk=?=
> wrote:
> > I will not be able to fix this due to how the
> > packaging system works.
[...]
> you're right. But it might help the next time, if you c
On Sun, 1 Nov 2020 08:22:27 +0100
=?UTF-8?B?TMOhc3psw7MgQsO2c3rDtnJtw6lueWkgKEdDUyk=?=
wrote:
> I will not be able to fix this due to how the
> packaging system works. When a Debian maintainer releases
> a new package version, s/he builds and tests it with the
> Sid/unstable repository. ... But c
On Sun, Nov 1, 2020 at 1:06 AM Bill Wohler wrote:
> Same here.
>
> Will you be able to fix this now so that everyone using fetchmail can
> get mail without having to jump through hoops like building fetchmail or
> finding the previous package?
You can fetch the previous package version and its bi
Same here.
Will you be able to fix this now so that everyone using fetchmail can
get mail without having to jump through hoops like building fetchmail or
finding the previous package?
--
Bill Wohler aka
http://www.newt.com/wohler/, GnuPG ID:610BD9AD
On Sat, 31 Oct 2020 19:50:09 +0100 Klaumi Klingsporn
wrote:
> I think it's because the new version of fetrchmail is
> compiled against openssl in sid, which is blocked there
> because of regressions.
As I thought: I rebuilt the fetchmail 6.4.13-1 package in
testing against the openssl-libraries
On Sat, 31 Oct 2020 09:39:46 +0100 Alex Bernier
wrote:
> Package: fetchmail
> Version: 6.4.13-1
> Severity: important
>
> Connections using SSL fails with the following error
> message :
>
> fetchmail: Loaded OpenSSL library 0x1010107f older than
> headers 0x1010108f, refusing to work.
Same he
Package: fetchmail
Version: 6.4.13-1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
Connections using SSL fails with the following error message :
fetchmail: Loaded OpenSSL library 0x1010107f older than headers 0x1010108f,
refusing to work.
fetchmail: xxx.domain.com: SSL connection failed.
fetchmail: soc
12 matches
Mail list logo
