Control: forcemerge 964926 -1
Control: affects 964926 ansible
On Ma, 20 oct 20, 14:18:09, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 20.10.20 um 13:58 schrieb Andrei POPESCU:
>
> Duplicate of #964926 afaics.
Indeed, sorry for not noticing.
> Would you be willing to test the current changes in
> https://salsa.de
Am 20.10.20 um 13:58 schrieb Andrei POPESCU:
> https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/16424
> which is triggered on stable if one is using a newer kernel (e.g. from
> backports, partial upgrades, self-compiled, etc.).
>
> Admittedly one option would be to upgrade to systemd from backports
> (on
Am 20.10.20 um 13:58 schrieb Andrei POPESCU:
> Package: systemd
> Version: 241-7~deb10u4
> Severity: important
> Tags: upstream
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> This is about
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853736
> https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/16424
> which is triggered on stab
Package: systemd
Version: 241-7~deb10u4
Severity: important
Tags: upstream
Dear Maintainer,
This is about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853736
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/16424
which is triggered on stable if one is using a newer kernel (e.g. from
backports, partial up
4 matches
Mail list logo