Bug#971928: fakeroot: Change to use fixed message sizes broke m68k

2020-10-09 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Hello Vasyl! On 10/10/20 1:47 AM, Vasyl Gello wrote: > In addition to my previous message, let me clarify why I need: > > fakeroot pbuilder … > > instead of using fakeroot inside the chroot unpacked by pbuilder. > > The key word is 'unprivileged' here, i.e considering nsjail without > /etc/su

Bug#971928: fakeroot: Change to use fixed message sizes broke m68k

2020-10-09 Thread Vasyl Gello
Dear colleagues, In addition to my previous message, let me clarify why I need: fakeroot pbuilder … instead of using fakeroot inside the chroot unpacked by pbuilder. The key word is 'unprivileged' here, i.e considering nsjail without /etc/sub{uid,gid} mappings, user 0 inside a namespace is ma

Bug#971928: fakeroot: Change to use fixed message sizes broke m68k

2020-10-09 Thread Vasyl Gello
Hi Adrian, > The change in [1] to use fixed-width members in fake_msg broke fakeroot > on m68k as this change altered the offsets in the fakestat struct due to > the additional #pragma pack(4) statements [2]: > > > libfakeroot, when sending message: Invalid argument > > On m68k, the default alig

Bug#971928: fakeroot: Change to use fixed message sizes broke m68k

2020-10-09 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Source: fakeroot Severity: important User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: m68k X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-...@lists.debian.org Hello! The change in [1] to use fixed-width members in fake_msg broke fakeroot on m68k as this change altered the offsets in the fakestat struct due to the additional #p