Bug#971243: sysprof: Split to separate binary packages

2021-09-11 Thread Jeremy Bicha
On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 4:27 AM Simon McVittie wrote: > On Sun, 27 Sep 2020 at 19:46:38 -0400, Jeremy Bicha wrote: > > We should split sysprof into separate packages, a library package, a > > development headers package, etc. > > I've already taken the first step by giving sysprof some versioned >

Bug#971243: sysprof: Split to separate binary packages

2020-09-28 Thread Simon McVittie
On Sun, 27 Sep 2020 at 19:46:38 -0400, Jeremy Bicha wrote: > We should split sysprof into separate packages, a library package, a > development headers package, etc. I've already taken the first step by giving sysprof some versioned Provides: - libsysprof-4 - libsysprof-4-dev - libsysprof-capture

Bug#971243: sysprof: Split to separate binary packages

2020-09-27 Thread Jeremy Bicha
Source: sysprof Version: 3.38.0-2 We should split sysprof into separate packages, a library package, a development headers package, etc. The biggest benefit would be for users of GNOME Builder. GNOME Builder integrates features from the sysprof library. Installing GNOME Builder also gets you the