❦ 20 juillet 2020 15:00 +00, Chris Lamb:
>> Lintian is a very useful tool, but too many stuff is a warning while
>> this is a matter of opinion. I have given up on the "info" level
>> since a long time for similar reasons. I would like not to give up on
>> the "warning" level.
>
> (It is a shame
Hi Vincent,
> >> the shebang is harmless and I won't
> >> patch or other upstream about a harmless shebang.
> >
> > As explained in this MR [2], we consider the hashbang an error. The
> > snippets are not meant to be executed. The upstream for
> > 'bash-completion' also does not use them.
> >
> >
Hello Felix,
Thanks for your quick reply.
❦ 19 juillet 2020 09:33 -07, Felix Lechner:
>> the shebang is harmless and I won't
>> patch or other upstream about a harmless shebang.
>
> As explained in this MR [2], we consider the hashbang an error. The
> snippets are not meant to be executed. The
Hi Vincent,
On Sun, Jul 19, 2020 at 9:03 AM Vincent Bernat wrote:
>
> bash-completion-with-hashbang got bump from
> minor to certain, after commit 70eaca50411.
I think that's a misunderstanding. We changed the scale back to the
simple EWI system after having classed tags by levels from the BTS f
Package: lintian
Version: 2.84.0
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hey!
I have just noticed that bash-completion-with-hashbang got bump from
minor to certain, after commit 70eaca50411. I don't understand the
rationale behind this commit, but in case of
bash-complet
5 matches
Mail list logo
