28.07.2020 18:53, Paul Gevers wrote:
[]
> I admit it's confusing, but it states: Is the removal to be done in a
> suite other than "unstable"? Don't select anything for "unstable"
>
Yes I've seen this. My thought was, - wait, I want
Control: reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
Hi Michael,
On 28-07-2020 10:00, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> 28.07.2020 10:53, Paul Gevers wrote:
> ..
>> These request should normally be filed against ftp.debian.org and the
>> package should be removed from unstable first (and then it's
>> automatically removed
28.07.2020 10:53, Paul Gevers wrote:
..
> These request should normally be filed against ftp.debian.org and the
> package should be removed from unstable first (and then it's
> automatically removed from testing). Is there any reason why you request
> the removal from testing or should the bug just
Hi Michael,
On 18-07-2020 11:51, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: rm
>
> The package openhackware builds a single binary blob, ppc_rom.bin,
> which is a bios/firmware for old PowerPC machines.
>
> T
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
The package openhackware builds a single binary blob, ppc_rom.bin,
which is a bios/firmware for old PowerPC machines.
This firmware were used by qemu package (namely, qemu-system-ppc)
to emulate
5 matches
Mail list logo
