On 13 December 2020 20:19:42 UTC, Salvatore Bonaccorso
wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Cc'in the security-team alias.
>
>It is actually unlikely for the moment that we will revert the
>200-disable-ghostscript-formats.patch patch again, which was firstly
>included in the 8:6.9.10.23+dfsg-2.1+deb10u1 upload. It
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 10:32:25AM +0100, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I agree with salvatore, that in general disabling pdf is the safer solution.
Yeah, this was intentionally, but I missed an entry for this in
debian/changelog.
> I am slowly recovering from work debt due to covid 19 lo
Hi,
I agree with salvatore, that in general disabling pdf is the safer solution.
I am slowly recovering from work debt due to covid 19 lockdown in
France (i was locked down three month, and I could only work by night
for payjob so debian work was not done), but I will accept patch.
The solution
Hi,
Cc'in the security-team alias.
On Wed, Oct 07, 2020 at 01:15:23PM -0700, Felix Lechner wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + patch
>
> Hi,
>
> > Is this because of a ghostscript vulnerability?
>
> The PDF policy restriction is also in effect on Debian stable even
> though that release ships with Gho
On Wed, 7 Oct 2020 13:15:23 -0700 Felix Lechner
wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + patch
>
> Hi,
>
> > Is this because of a ghostscript vulnerability?
>
> The PDF policy restriction is also in effect on Debian stable even
> though that release ships with Ghostscript 9.27, which online sources
> sugge
Control: tags -1 + patch
Hi,
> Is this because of a ghostscript vulnerability?
The PDF policy restriction is also in effect on Debian stable even
though that release ships with Ghostscript 9.27, which online sources
suggest is safe. [1]
Converting images to PDF is a very common functionality. P
6 matches
Mail list logo
