Bug#962509: Not always boot arguments must include a root= parameter

2020-09-07 Thread Richard Laager
On 9/7/20 4:00 AM, kvaps wrote: > Thanks for your intention to help. > It seems I already found the correct solution for my case, > > The problem persists only for the scripts/local, which is set by > default (BOOT=local) > We can review two cases where it might be caused: > > 1. LTSP and booting

Bug#962509: Not always boot arguments must include a root= parameter

2020-09-07 Thread kvaps
Hi Richard, Thanks for your intention to help. It seems I already found the correct solution for my case, The problem persists only for the scripts/local, which is set by default (BOOT=local) We can review two cases where it might be caused: 1. LTSP and booting over the network I implemented

Bug#962509: Not always boot arguments must include a root= parameter

2020-09-06 Thread Richard Laager
On Tue, 9 Jun 2020 01:25:58 +0200 kvaps wrote: > Package: initramfs-tools > Version: 0.133+deb10u1 > > Hi, after the change introduced in f8ceeb90 both zfs and http booting > methods are not working anymore, it stops on the message: > > No root device specified. Boot arguments must include a roo

Bug#962509: Not always boot arguments must include a root= parameter

2020-06-08 Thread kvaps
Package: initramfs-tools Version: 0.133+deb10u1 Hi, after the change introduced in f8ceeb90 both zfs and http booting methods are not working anymore, it stops on the message: No root device specified. Boot arguments must include a root= parameter. See the related issues: - https://forum.proxmo