Bug#960754: wham-align FTBFS on !x86

2020-12-22 Thread Andreas Tille
On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 11:42:42AM +0200, Juhani Numminen wrote: > Adrian Bunk's NMU was not included in the upload 0.1.5-4, so the FTBFS was > reintroduced. To me, that seems unintended. Definitely unintended for sure! Thanks for spotting - a fix is on its way. Kind regards Andreas. -

Bug#960754: wham-align FTBFS on !x86

2020-12-22 Thread Juhani Numminen
[I had to resend this mail, it did not reach the bug report the first time.] Hi, On Sat, 16 May 2020 13:53:47 +0300 Adrian Bunk wrote: > Source: wham-align > Version: 0.1.5-1 > Severity: important > Tags: patch ftbfs > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=wham-align&suite=sid > > .

Bug#960754: wham-align FTBFS on !x86

2020-05-16 Thread Adrian Bunk
Source: wham-align Version: 0.1.5-1 Severity: important Tags: patch ftbfs https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=wham-align&suite=sid ... pair.h:840:2: error: #error "POPCNT is only supported in Intel X86/IA-64 architectures" 840 | #error "POPCNT is only supported in Intel X86/IA-64 ar