Bug#958322: Info received (Bug#958322: Info received ())

2020-05-14 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
OK, with the previous NMU it works, so we can unbrand without problem the lzf library

Bug#958322: Info received ()

2020-05-14 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
I am not sure at all of this in fact I red this closed bug https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=955456 I discovered that the NMU was not included in the git repository.

Bug#958322:

2020-05-14 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
Hello, I tryed to unbrand the lzf library but it end up with failing unit tests I do not know the internals of liblzf. Timo Röhling can you have a look at this issue ? Cheers Frederic It seems that the embeded version of lzf and the one from your liblzf package are different. test_filter (

Bug#958322: bitshuffle: Unvendor liblzf

2020-04-20 Thread Timo Röhling
Source: bitshuffle Version: 0.3.5-3.1 Severity: wishlist Dear maintainer, I wanted to let you know that I have packaged the liblzf library recently, which is also vendored with your package. You may want to unvendor liblzf in one of your future releases. Cheers Timo