On Sat, Apr 11, 2020 at 06:20:13AM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>
> pycsw required the same changes. Those are also ready in git.
Ah... I was wondering why it was not listed by build-rdepends script
(without parameters), but it is probably because it is in non-free.
> You don't have to wa
On 4/11/20 12:34 AM, Cédric Boutillier wrote:
>> When do you plan to move it to unstable?
>
> Given that shapelib is the only reverse build-dependency failing because
> of this change, we can move to unstable when shapelib is ready to.
> What about in 7 days from now? Tell me what suits best for y
Dear Sebastiaan,
On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 12:20:52PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>
> Hopefully that (new) behavior will stay, this is not the first time an
> update of ruby-ronn required changes.
I think (or at least hope too) that it is here to stay.
> When do you plan to move it to un
Control: tags -1 pending
Hi Cédric,
Thanks for reporting this issue.
On 4/9/20 12:02 PM, Cédric Boutillier wrote:
> I uploaded ruby-ronn 0.9.0 in experimental. This version contains a
> change that strips all extensions (not just .ronn) from processed files
> to produce the name of the man page.
Source: shapelib
Version: 1.5.0-1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
I uploaded ruby-ronn 0.9.0 in experimental. This version contains a
change that strips all extensions (not just .ronn) from processed files
to produce the name of the man page. It seems that the loop present in
debian/rules t
5 matches
Mail list logo
