Bug#954826: libgcc-8-dev: depends on unavailable version of libgcc-s1

2020-04-02 Thread Andreas Beckmann
On 02/04/2020 11.13, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 4/2/20 1:30 AM, Andreas Beckmann wrote: >> On Thu, 26 Mar 2020 21:02:59 +0100 Matthias Klose wrote: >>> yes, but we cannot rebuild the package, because it build-depends on gnat-8. >>> Filed a removal bug for gcc-8 instead. >> >> An easy fix would pro

Bug#954826: libgcc-8-dev: depends on unavailable version of libgcc-s1

2020-04-02 Thread Matthias Klose
On 4/2/20 1:30 AM, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > On Thu, 26 Mar 2020 21:02:59 +0100 Matthias Klose wrote: >> yes, but we cannot rebuild the package, because it build-depends on gnat-8. >> Filed a removal bug for gcc-8 instead. > > An easy fix would probably be to temporarily add a versioned > Provi

Bug#954826: libgcc-8-dev: depends on unavailable version of libgcc-s1

2020-04-01 Thread Andreas Beckmann
On Thu, 26 Mar 2020 21:02:59 +0100 Matthias Klose wrote: > yes, but we cannot rebuild the package, because it build-depends on gnat-8. > Filed a removal bug for gcc-8 instead. An easy fix would probably be to temporarily add a versioned Provides: libgcc-s1 (= 1:${binary:Version}) to libgcc-s1 i

Bug#954826: libgcc-8-dev: depends on unavailable version of libgcc-s1

2020-03-28 Thread Mauricio Calvao
I have come across this grave bug as well. I have a Debian sid suite in my desktop machine, regularly updated every other week. If I try: # apt install libgcc-8-dev I get: Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Some packages could not be instal

Bug#954826: libgcc-8-dev: depends on unavailable version of libgcc-s1

2020-03-26 Thread Matthias Klose
On 3/26/20 8:51 PM, Colomban Wendling wrote: > Hi, > > Sorry if I'm too far off the tree, but isn't this just an overlook of > the dependency switch from libgcc1 (which has an "1" epoch) to the > libgcc-s1 (which doesn't have an epoch)? > > ATM at least clang-9 (which is still the default in unst

Bug#954826: libgcc-8-dev: depends on unavailable version of libgcc-s1

2020-03-26 Thread Colomban Wendling
Hi, Sorry if I'm too far off the tree, but isn't this just an overlook of the dependency switch from libgcc1 (which has an "1" epoch) to the libgcc-s1 (which doesn't have an epoch)? ATM at least clang-9 (which is still the default in unstable) depends on libgcc-8-dev, and while I probably miss so

Bug#954826: libgcc-8-dev: depends on unavailable version of libgcc-s1

2020-03-24 Thread Matthias Klose
On 3/24/20 6:46 AM, Sven Joachim wrote: > Package: libgcc-8-dev > Version: 8.4.0-2 > Severity: grave > > The latest version of gcc-8 is not installable because libgcc-8-dev > depends on libgcc-s1 (>= 1:8.4.0-2), but the version of libgcc-s1 in the > archive does not have an epoch and is therefore

Bug#954826: libgcc-8-dev: depends on unavailable version of libgcc-s1

2020-03-23 Thread Sven Joachim
Package: libgcc-8-dev Version: 8.4.0-2 Severity: grave The latest version of gcc-8 is not installable because libgcc-8-dev depends on libgcc-s1 (>= 1:8.4.0-2), but the version of libgcc-s1 in the archive does not have an epoch and is therefore too low to fulfill this requirement. The same holds f