Hi Markus,
> I suggest we wait a little for a response from
> non-f...@buildd.debian.org before we make another upload. However if
> there is no response in two weeks, we can just proceed by making a
> binary upload of runescape.
Perfect, I will be waiting and I hope it is a positive answer. ;)
Hi Markus,
I hope everything is fine with you and your family.
> I had uploaded the new version of runescape to fix bug 953487 because
> you stated in
>
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=953487#25
>
> that the package has been whitelisted. Apparently this is not the case
> hen
I suggest we wait a little for a response from
non-f...@buildd.debian.org before we make another upload. However if
there is no response in two weeks, we can just proceed by making a
binary upload of runescape.
Bug #956275 can be resolved by replacing the runescape.png icon. The
license is most li
Hello Carlos,
I had uploaded the new version of runescape to fix bug 953487 because
you stated in
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=953487#25
that the package has been whitelisted. Apparently this is not the case
hence I am writing to non-f...@buildd.debian.org again and I kindly
Hi Ivo,
> This new version doesn't fix the autobuilding issue:
>
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=runescape
I don't understand how the package still has the autobuilding problem. I did
several construction tests via pbuilder and sbuild and there were no problems,
as shown in the
Control: reopen -1
On Wed, Apr 08, 2020 at 10:20:28PM +, Debian FTP Masters wrote:
> runescape (0.7-1) unstable; urgency=medium
> .
>* New upstream release. (Closes: #953487, #953714)
This new version doesn't fix the autobuilding issue:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=ru
6 matches
Mail list logo
