Bug#952555: azure-uamqp-python: please make the build reproducible

2020-03-11 Thread Chris Lamb
Hi Luca, > I've set reproducible=+fixfilepath as suggested on > https://reproducible-builds.org/docs/build-path/ and it seems to fix > the issue. I'll upload shortly. Neat. Not at all a request that you revert this but there is some irony in that the note on tests.reproducible-builds.org says:

Bug#952555: azure-uamqp-python: please make the build reproducible

2020-03-11 Thread Luca Boccassi
Control: tags -1 - upstream - help + pending On Thu, 2020-02-27 at 01:57 +, Chris Lamb wrote: > Hi Luca, > > > > At a glance I cannot. However, I might suggest running it again; > > > do > > > you get the same differences, if you know what I mean? > > > > The details look slightly different

Bug#952555: azure-uamqp-python: please make the build reproducible

2020-02-26 Thread Chris Lamb
Hi Luca, > > At a glance I cannot. However, I might suggest running it again; do > > you get the same differences, if you know what I mean? > > The details look slightly different (reports are not 1:1 match), albeit > in the same "areas". Getcha. Sometimes these intermediate differences or lack t

Bug#952555: azure-uamqp-python: please make the build reproducible

2020-02-26 Thread Luca Boccassi
On Wed, 2020-02-26 at 01:57 +, Chris Lamb wrote: > Hi Luca, > > > The diffoscope html report is attached, but can't make head or tail > > of > > it - it shows differences in the shared object. Does it ring any > > bell? > > At a glance I cannot. However, I might suggest running it again; do >

Bug#952555: azure-uamqp-python: please make the build reproducible

2020-02-25 Thread Chris Lamb
Hi Luca, > The diffoscope html report is attached, but can't make head or tail of > it - it shows differences in the shared object. Does it ring any bell? At a glance I cannot. However, I might suggest running it again; do you get the same differences, if you know what I mean? Best wishes, --

Bug#952555: azure-uamqp-python: please make the build reproducible

2020-02-25 Thread Chris Lamb
forwarded 952555 https://github.com/Azure/azure-uamqp-python/pull/144 thanks Hi Luca, > I need to check the CMake build for the vendored library (brr) - it > might not be taking all the compiler flags from dpkg. IIRC we have a > custom gcc patch to override the paths for __FUNCTION__ and friends,

Bug#952555: azure-uamqp-python: please make the build reproducible

2020-02-25 Thread Luca Boccassi
Control: tags -1 pending On Tue, 2020-02-25 at 10:17 -0800, Chris Lamb wrote: > Source: azure-uamqp-python > Version: 1.2.6-1 > Severity: wishlist > Tags: patch > User: > reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org > > Usertags: filesystem buildpath > X-Debbugs-Cc: > reproducible-b...@lists.ali

Bug#952555: azure-uamqp-python: please make the build reproducible

2020-02-25 Thread Chris Lamb
Source: azure-uamqp-python Version: 1.2.6-1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: filesystem buildpath X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-b...@lists.alioth.debian.org Hi, Whilst working on the Reproducible Builds effort [0] we noticed that azure-uamqp-