Hi
> was temporary, just referring what my patch impacts and will close this
> issue.
>
> The skip you made in your patch does not fix all issues, only workaround
> them.
>
Oh! I can see. I was looking on the last commit.
>
> >
> > Will you push new patch release soon? Or should I
Le mer. 4 mars 2020 à 16:38, eamanu a écrit :
> Hi olivier,
>
> On 04/03/2020 12:13, olivier sallou wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I saw you started some work on python-ftputil to fix #952208.
> >
> > I just pushed to git repo a fix for that.
>
> I am a little confused, you just added description to the patc
Hi olivier,
On 04/03/2020 12:13, olivier sallou wrote:
> Hi,
> I saw you started some work on python-ftputil to fix #952208.
>
> I just pushed to git repo a fix for that.
I am a little confused, you just added description to the patch?
Why do you douplicate on d/changelog the (Closes #bugnumb
Hi,
I saw you started some work on python-ftputil to fix #952208.
I just pushed to git repo a fix for that.
Will you push new patch release soon? Or should I do?
I wonder however why you pushed a gbp.conf (not really expected usually)
setting branch as debian/master , which does not exists and d
Source: python-ftputil
Version: 3.4-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200222 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules build
> dh build -
5 matches
Mail list logo
