Control: severity -1 important
On 2/16/20 9:34 AM, Tomas Janousek wrote:
> Package: proftpd-basic
> Version: 1.3.6-4+deb10u3
> Severity: normal
>
> It appears bug #839880 reappeared in current Debian stable:
>
Set that to important.
H.
--
sigfault
#206401 http://counter.li.org
signature.a
Hi again,
On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 09:07:26PM +, Tomas Janousek wrote:
> I needed amd64 so I grabbed
> https://salsa.debian.org/debian-proftpd-team/proftpd/commit/20c8f39058443bf13afbb4ced069d181bd8d235c
> and built it myself. I can confirm that it does indeed fix the issue. Feel
> free to rele
Hi Hilmar,
Thanks for your quick reply and sorry for my late one, I had a busy week. :-(
On Sun, Feb 16, 2020 at 11:25:45PM +0100, Hilmar Preuße wrote:
> >> It appears bug #839880 reappeared in current Debian stable:
> >>
> > I'm unable to reproduce the issue, but it looks similar to
> >
> > htt
Am 16.02.2020 um 21:38 teilte Hilmar Preuße mit:
> Am 16.02.2020 um 09:34 teilte Tomas Janousek mit:
Hi Tomas,
>> It appears bug #839880 reappeared in current Debian stable:
>>
> I'm unable to reproduce the issue, but it looks similar to
>
> https://github.com/proftpd/proftpd/issues/656
>
> Ple
Am 16.02.2020 um 09:34 teilte Tomas Janousek mit:
Hi Tomas,
> It appears bug #839880 reappeared in current Debian stable:
>
I'm unable to reproduce the issue, but it looks similar to
https://github.com/proftpd/proftpd/issues/656
Please read through the issue and report back if it describe your
Hello Tomas,
Am 16.02.20 um 17:30 schrieb Tomas Janousek:
> So unless that palloc tries to allocate way more memory than it should,
> I don't think that's the problem.
Unfortunately that allocation seems just "sizeof(pr_response_t)",
so I guess it is not an unusual big allocation.
Kind regards,
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 16, 2020 at 05:25:34PM +0100, Bernhard Übelacker wrote:
> Could the call to palloc just before have failed to allocate memory?
If that's a question for me, then: extremely unlikely.
I tried just restarting proftpd, I tried restarting the whole container.
There are no memory limit
Dear Maintainer,
I just tried to reconstruct the line informations from a
running process with an attached gdb and installed dbgsym package.
0x7f373b3ad458 in __memset_sse2_unaligned at
../sysdeps/x86_64/multiarch/memset-vec-unaligned-erms.S:120
0x55d7e2f68a64 in pcalloc at pool.c:620
Package: proftpd-basic
Version: 1.3.6-4+deb10u3
Severity: normal
It appears bug #839880 reappeared in current Debian stable:
2020-02-16 09:02:15,218 proftpd[114] : ProFTPD 1.3.6
(stable) (built Tue Dec 31 2019 11:06:17 UTC) standalone mode STARTUP
2020-02-16 09:02:29,812 proftpd[373] ():
---
9 matches
Mail list logo
