This bug has been fixed upstream and it will go in 1.8.5 release.
Thanks for reporting.
Alberto
Hi Alberto,
hi Jamie,
Am 17.02.20 um 18:06 schrieb Alberto Molina Coballes:
>
> These rules were not generated by ufw. The current released version of
> ufw does not do any management of the nat table. Furthermore,
> iptables-restore rules in /etc/ufw/*rules do not contain any '-F's.
>
I made t
Control: forwarded -1 https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1407
Control: severity -1 normal
Hi Christoph,
I'm quoting a email from Jamie Strandboge, who is both the
maintainer in Debian and the creator of ufw, and has kindly replied my
question about this bug:
[quote]
...
These rules
On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 11:05:13AM +0100, Christoph Martin wrote:
>
> I choose the grave severity because the bug makes a reload of ufw fail
> and then the firewall is off !
>
Yes, I agree with you that it's a serious situation, but we have to
determine if it's a general case of iptables (which
Hil Alberto,
Am 13.02.20 um 10:11 schrieb Alberto Molina Coballes:
>
> Is this ruleset a real one obtained from ufw? I ask because the next one
> doesn't result in segfault:
>
> *nat
> -F PREROUTING
> -F POSTROUTING
> -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -p tcp --dport 22 -j REDIRECT --to-ports 1194
> COMMIT
>
Hi Alberto,
Am 13.02.20 um 10:11 schrieb Alberto Molina Coballes:
> I don't understand the rule "-F PREROUTING" after a "-A ..." one. It
> seems that the segfault happens in this specific case (it's a bug of
> course, but not a bug with grave severity).
I choose the grave severity because the bug
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
Hi Christoph,
Is this ruleset a real one obtained from ufw? I ask because the next one
doesn't result in segfault:
*nat
-F PREROUTING
-F POSTROUTING
-A PREROUTING -i eth0 -p tcp --dport 22 -j REDIRECT --to-ports 1194
COMMIT
I don't understand the rule "-F PREROUTING" af
Dear Maintainer,
I tried to collect some more information and got
the following backtrace with the restore command
from the submitter.
It looks like "expr->ops" contains a null pointer
that gets dereferenced.
Unfortunately I still see the same crash after
upgrading to the versions in backports in
Package: iptables
Version: 1.8.2-4
Severity: grave
Dear Maintainer,
after updateing from stretch to buster ufw failed to work.
we have nat-table entries for PREROUTING and POSTROUTING . iptables-restore
segfaults on these rules. The following rules lead to the error:
*nat
-F PREROUTING
-A PRERO
9 matches
Mail list logo
