> I hope that helps!
Yes, thanks! I will try to allocate some time to look into this.
Best,
Gab
On Tue, 14 Jan 2020 at 14:15, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
>
> On 2020-01-13 23:10:09, Gabriele wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > May I ask to clarify what the request is about?
>
> It's about shipping the austin-tui
On 2020-01-13 23:10:09, Gabriele wrote:
> Hi
>
> May I ask to clarify what the request is about?
It's about shipping the austin-tui binary in Debian, in one form or the
other.
> Is it for a new Debian package, e.g. austin-tui, to be produced so
> that it is easier to install the TUI? Or is it a r
Hi
May I ask to clarify what the request is about? Is it for a new Debian
package, e.g. austin-tui, to be produced so that it is easier to
install the TUI? Or is it a request for providing the TUI already with
the installation of the existing Austin package? At the moment,
installation from the Gi
Package: austin
Version: 1.0.0-1
Severity: wishlist
Could we get more of the goodies shipped with austin?
The default output is not exactly useful, as it requires
flamegraph.pl, which doesn't seem packaged as a standalone binary in
Debian.
(Well, technically, there's a version of flamegraph.pl a
4 matches
Mail list logo
