Bug#944968: popularity-contest: Program accesses internal dpkg database

2021-06-17 Thread Guillem Jover
On Thu, 2021-06-17 at 10:31:52 +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: > Sorry about not following here but then the freeze was coming and I > stopped working on this. Thanks for bringing this up now that the > release is close. Sure, no problem! > So the main point is: is it a stable interface for which co

Bug#944968: popularity-contest: Program accesses internal dpkg database

2021-06-17 Thread Bill Allombert
On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 11:02:52PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > On Sat, 2020-12-12 at 15:33:47 +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 08:55:00PM +, Niels Thykier wrote: > > > While it would take a bit of restructuring / refactoring, I think it > > > would be possible to use a

Bug#944968: popularity-contest: Program accesses internal dpkg database

2021-06-16 Thread Guillem Jover
On Sat, 2020-12-12 at 15:33:47 +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: > On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 08:55:00PM +, Niels Thykier wrote: > > While it would take a bit of restructuring / refactoring, I think it > > would be possible to use a single dpkg-query for everything and still be > > able to process the

Bug#944968: popularity-contest: Program accesses internal dpkg database

2020-12-12 Thread Bill Allombert
On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 08:55:00PM +, Niels Thykier wrote: > On Tue, 19 Nov 2019 11:27:56 +0100 Bill Allombert > > While it would take a bit of restructuring / refactoring, I think it > would be possible to use a single dpkg-query for everything and still be > able to process the data in a "s

Bug#944968: popularity-contest: Program accesses internal dpkg database

2020-02-01 Thread Bill Allombert
On Sat, Feb 01, 2020 at 07:09:56PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: > On Sat, Feb 01, 2020 at 07:02:38PM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: > > On Thu, 2019-11-28 at 22:41:44 +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 08:55:00PM +, Niels Thykier wrote: > > > > While it would take a bit of

Bug#944968: popularity-contest: Program accesses internal dpkg database

2020-02-01 Thread Bill Allombert
On Sat, Feb 01, 2020 at 07:02:38PM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: > On Thu, 2019-11-28 at 22:41:44 +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 08:55:00PM +, Niels Thykier wrote: > > > While it would take a bit of restructuring / refactoring, I think it > > > would be possible to use a

Bug#944968: popularity-contest: Program accesses internal dpkg database

2020-02-01 Thread Guillem Jover
On Thu, 2019-11-28 at 22:41:44 +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: > On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 08:55:00PM +, Niels Thykier wrote: > > While it would take a bit of restructuring / refactoring, I think it > > would be possible to use a single dpkg-query for everything and still be > > able to process the

Bug#944968: popularity-contest: Program accesses internal dpkg database

2019-11-28 Thread Bill Allombert
On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 08:55:00PM +, Niels Thykier wrote: > While it would take a bit of restructuring / refactoring, I think it > would be possible to use a single dpkg-query for everything and still be > able to process the data in a "streaming" fashion. Yes this could work, however this is

Bug#944968: popularity-contest: Program accesses internal dpkg database

2019-11-28 Thread Niels Thykier
On Tue, 19 Nov 2019 11:27:56 +0100 Bill Allombert wrote: > On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 09:34:57AM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: > > Hi! > > > > On Mon, 2019-11-18 at 06:51:00 +, Niels Thykier wrote: > > > On Sun, 17 Nov 2019 22:59:58 +0100 Bill Allombert wrote: > > > > On Sun, Nov 17, 2019 at 10:44

Bug#944968: popularity-contest: Program accesses internal dpkg database

2019-11-19 Thread Bill Allombert
On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 09:34:57AM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: > Hi! > > On Mon, 2019-11-18 at 06:51:00 +, Niels Thykier wrote: > > On Sun, 17 Nov 2019 22:59:58 +0100 Bill Allombert wrote: > > > On Sun, Nov 17, 2019 at 10:44:02PM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: > > > > Source: popularity-contest >

Bug#944968: popularity-contest: Program accesses internal dpkg database

2019-11-19 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Mon, 2019-11-18 at 06:51:00 +, Niels Thykier wrote: > On Sun, 17 Nov 2019 22:59:58 +0100 Bill Allombert wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 17, 2019 at 10:44:02PM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: > > > Source: popularity-contest > > > Source-Version: 1.69 > > > Severity: important > > > User: debian-d...

Bug#944968: popularity-contest: Program accesses internal dpkg database

2019-11-17 Thread Niels Thykier
On Sun, 17 Nov 2019 22:59:58 +0100 Bill Allombert wrote: > On Sun, Nov 17, 2019 at 10:44:02PM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: > > Source: popularity-contest > > Source-Version: 1.69 > > Severity: important > > User: debian-d...@lists.debian.org > > Usertags: dpkg-db-access-blocker > > > > Hi! > > >

Bug#944968: popularity-contest: Program accesses internal dpkg database

2019-11-17 Thread Bill Allombert
On Sun, Nov 17, 2019 at 10:44:02PM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: > Source: popularity-contest > Source-Version: 1.69 > Severity: important > User: debian-d...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: dpkg-db-access-blocker > > Hi! > > This package contains the «popularity-contest» program, which directly > acc

Bug#944968: popularity-contest: Program accesses internal dpkg database

2019-11-17 Thread Guillem Jover
Source: popularity-contest Source-Version: 1.69 Severity: important User: debian-d...@lists.debian.org Usertags: dpkg-db-access-blocker Hi! This package contains the «popularity-contest» program, which directly accesses the dpkg internal database, instead of using one of the public interfaces pro