Control: tags -1 pending
Hi all,
cgal migrated to testing. The transition is finished after the
autoremoval of k3d and rheolef in a couple of days, or when their fixed,
whatever happens first.
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 12/8/19 7:15 PM, Joachim Reichel wrote:
> openemsbinNMU would be sufficient, unrelated FTBFS
>(#946264), but not on autoremoval list (WHY?)
RC bug report is too young.
"
Packages which have RC bugs that are present in both testing and
unstable, and which have no recen
Update on the current state:
cloudcompare binNMU successful, all green
gudhi binNMU successful, all green
mshr binNMU successful, all green
openfoam binNMU successful, all green
openscad fixed by maintainer, all green
pygalmesh fixed by maintainer, all green
Hi Paul,
could you please trigger another binNMU for gudhi on mips64el? There was a
problem in CGAL that I fixed in 5.0-5.
Thanks,
Joachim
On 12/6/19 2:34 PM, Joachim Reichel wrote:
> sfcgal fixed by maintainer, but armhf and mips64el still missing
It built fine on mips64el, armhf is a new. RM bug: #946261
> pprepair FTBFS, no patch known (#944775), autoremoval in 13 days
> prepairFTBFS, no patch known (#944776
Update on the current state:
cloudcompare binNMU successful, all green
mshr binNMU successful, all green
openfoam binNMU successful, all green
openscad fixed by maintainer, all green
gudhi binNMU successful, but mips64el still missing
sfcgal fixed by maint
Control: tags -1 confirmed
Hi Joachim,
On 03-12-2019 08:31, Joachim Reichel wrote:
> I've contacted the maintainers on Nov. 11th about the upcoming transition and
> included my patches, but did not file bugs so far.
I suggest you file those bugs against the packages that you're not in
contact al
Control: tags -1 -moreinfo
Hi Paul,
On 02.12.19 21:34, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Have those patches been submitted to the BTS? Are the maintainers of
> these packages aware of this? Are the changes trivial and are you ready
> to NMU them (except rheolef)?
I've contacted the maintainers on Nov. 11th a
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Joachim,
On 15-11-2019 17:27, Joachim Reichel wrote:
> crrcsimneeds source code changes, patch available
[...]
> k3dneeds source code changes, patch available
[...]
> openscad needs source code changes, patch available
> pgrouting needs source code chan
Update:
crrcsimneeds source code changes, patch available
gudhi binNMU should be sufficient
k3dneeds source code changes, patch available
openemsbinNMU should be sufficient
openscad needs source code changes, patch available
pgrouting needs source code changes, patch availa
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hi,
I'd like to request a transition slot for CGAL 5.0. The CGAL library is now
header-only, i.e., the two library packages "libcgal13" and "libcgal-qt5-14"
are now gone.
Status of reve
11 matches
Mail list logo
