Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
Control: tags -1 confirmed
Control: block -1 by 947805
Hi Laurent, Andreas,
On 31-12-2019 01:20, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
>> peony-extensions - no rdeps, unmaintained <--- temporary removal?
>> not really, the package is
>> ag
Le 30/12/19 à 22:24, Paul Gevers a écrit :
> Hi Laurent, Andreas,
> What's the current status of the two packages reported unfixed? It's not
> clear if they either FTBFS or if they are just not tried to be fixed in
> experimental. I asked to have bugs filed, but I didn't spot them.
>
> peony-extens
Hi Laurent, Andreas,
On 30-12-2019 15:09, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> So apparently this was a bug in gupnp that was making the tests deadlock
> and for some reasons the version fixing this was stuck in the armel
> buildd...
>
> anyway, gupnp-igd is now building fine in experimental.
Good.
> I
On Mon, 21 Oct 2019 21:19:14 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> On 16-10-2019 08:37, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> > The final real blocker as I can see it is the gupnp-igd armel FTBFS.
>
> Could you please file a bug about this and add it as a blocker of this
bug?
>
> > The problem is 100%
Hi Andreas,
On 16-10-2019 08:37, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> The final real blocker as I can see it is the gupnp-igd armel FTBFS.
Could you please file a bug about this and add it as a blocker of this bug?
> The problem is 100% reproducible on abel porterbox.
> The tests that hangs are the final
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: moreinfo
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hello!
The gssdp and gupnp transitions are best done together. The transition
has previously been discussed a bit on IRC but I'm filing this for
tracking purposes for gett
6 matches
Mail list logo
