On Sun, 6 Oct 2019, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> guide. About the lto issue, it is fixed in the branch 9 (I am focussing my
> time on this branch):
I don’t mind working on 9 either, it’s just that some other programs
cannot be built at the moment, and if we fix 9 only then these problems
pile on unti
On Sun, 6 Oct 2019, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
>> In the meantime, would you mind changing llvm-defaults to go
>> back to version 7 on x32 which while outdated can at least
>> build things (like src:v4l-utils) that are now BD-Uninstallable.
>
>I am afraid we don't have this capability.
>
>Sorry.
OK,
Le 06/10/2019 à 02:59, Thorsten Glaser a écrit :
On Sun, 6 Oct 2019, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
… which is caused by:
cc1: error: unrecognized argument to '-flto=' option: 'thin'
Somehow, the build system applies -flto=thin to the host compiler,
and GCC doesn’t support this flag.
This is but th
> I’m attaching the patch and am currently building it locally to
> see whether this was all or whether more is needed.
It failed very early with…
[…]
-- Builtin supported architectures:
-- Linker detection: GNU ld
-- Linker detection: GNU ld
-- Builtin supported architectures:
-- check-shadowcal
Source: llvm-toolchain-8
Version: 1:8.0.1-3
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source, but built in the past, on d-ports
arch
One of the build errors is caused by you dropping a patch that,
according to d/changelog in llvm-toolchain-8, was pertinent in
both llvm-t
5 matches
Mail list logo
