control: tag -1 +pending
Hello Russ, Ansgar,
Thank you for the valuable discussion. I too second the below.
I compared the text to be removed and README.runlevels side-by-side, and
discovered that some ideas, explanation of which we are removing, are
implicitly assumed by README.runlevels. I'v
Ansgar writes:
> Russ Allbery writes:
>> I'm hesitant to remove all discussion of run levels because package
>> maintainers are still responsible for choosing a run level at which to
>> start their service and providing that run level as an argument to
>> update-rc.d.
> No, maintainer scripts ca
Russ Allbery writes:
> I'm hesitant to remove all discussion of run levels because package
> maintainers are still responsible for choosing a run level at which to
> start their service and providing that run level as an argument to
> update-rc.d.
No, maintainer scripts call `update-rc.d defaults
Sean Whitton writes:
> On Thu 26 Sep 2019 at 09:01AM +02, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
>> Control: reassign -1 debian-policy
>>
>> The section on initscripts has too much implementation details about
>> /etc/rcn.d; these are better explained by external documentation.
> Are you saying that they are *
Hello,
On Sun 29 Sep 2019 at 10:21AM +02, Ansgar wrote:
> I think README.runlevels documents everything about how rcn.d scripts
> are called that Policy also documents (at least the part removed in my
> diff).
Okay, thanks for the feedback.
It would be good to have a third party review the othe
Sean Whitton writes:
> On Thu 26 Sep 2019 at 09:01AM +02, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
>> The section on initscripts has too much implementation details about
>> /etc/rcn.d; these are better explained by external documentation.
>
> Are you saying that they are *currently* better explained by actually
>
Hello,
On Thu 26 Sep 2019 at 09:01AM +02, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> Control: reassign -1 debian-policy
>
> The section on initscripts has too much implementation details about
> /etc/rcn.d; these are better explained by external documentation.
Are you saying that they are *currently* better expl
Control: reassign -1 debian-policy
The section on initscripts has too much implementation details about
/etc/rcn.d; these are better explained by external documentation.
Also the rationale for why `DISABLED=yes` (or similar) fits better
into a footnote than the main text (IMHO).
(Policy also shou
Package: bugs.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
The section on initscripts has too much implementation details about
/etc/rcn.d; these are better explained by external documentation.
Also the rationale for why `DISABLED=yes` (or similar) fits better
into a footnote than the main text (IMHO).
9 matches
Mail list logo
