What was the point of introducing the python-fdb (py2) package again? It
will never enter testing.
On Saturday, December 7, 2019 8:03:42 PM EST Russell Stuart wrote:
> On Sat, 2019-12-07 at 23:46 +, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > I won't, but I think you have it backwards. Until changes like this
> > are made, python2 can't be removed. Your approach leaves us with a
> > Catch 22.
>
> Thanks.
On Sat, 2019-12-07 at 23:46 +, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> I won't, but I think you have it backwards. Until changes like this
> are made, python2 can't be removed. Your approach leaves us with a
> Catch 22.
Thanks.
Part of the reason for my reluctance is I don't understand the haste in
removi
On December 7, 2019 11:23:50 PM UTC, Russell Stuart
wrote:
>On Sat, 2019-12-07 at 15:27 -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>> Technically this is blocked by #938555, but it's only a Suggests
>> relationship, so I would think it's OK to go ahead to drop the
>> python-fdb binary. If you are busy and
On Sat, 2019-12-07 at 15:27 -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> Technically this is blocked by #938555, but it's only a Suggests
> relationship, so I would think it's OK to go ahead to drop the
> python-fdb binary. If you are busy and would prefer someone else
> handle it, please let me know and I'll
On Fri, 30 Aug 2019 07:16:59 + Matthias Klose wrote:
> Package: src:fdb
> Version: 2.0.0-1
> Severity: normal
> Tags: sid bullseye
> User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: py2removal
>
> Python2 becomes end-of-live upstream, and Debian aims to remove
> Python2 from the distribution,
6 matches
Mail list logo
