On Wed, 16 Aug 2023 21:31:25 -0400
=?UTF-8?Q?Mario_Gonz=C3=A1lez_Troncoso?= wrote:
> Hey, I might be able to help build deb packages. Because I've been
> learning rust for a few, this seems a good place to start contributing
> to Debian.
>
> May I know what's the bug's latest status and wher
Hey, I might be able to help build deb packages. Because I've been
learning rust for a few, this seems a good place to start contributing
to Debian.
May I know what's the bug's latest status and where should I start first?
Thanks!
--
https://www.linkedin.com/in/gonzalemario
Oleg Kostyuchenko:
> Hi,
>
> So you actually removed the cargo book from the package. I'd say that made
> the package plain unusable.
>
> If you are not able to ship the cargo book infrastructure now, why did you
> remove the book from the package in the first place, instead of sticking with
>
Hi,
So you actually removed the cargo book from the package. I'd say that made the
package plain unusable.
If you are not able to ship the cargo book infrastructure now, why did you
remove the book from the package in the first place, instead of sticking with
the old working version?
In addit
Hi, it will be non-trivial to fix this bug and I personally am unlikely to have
time for it. You will need to:
1. vendor mdbook as well as cargo. This will involve editing the debian scripts
in debian/make_orig_multi.sh, something that involves calling `cargo vendor`
for the src/doc directory.
Package: cargo-doc
Version: 0.37.0-3
This package surely is intended to bundle the docs as available here,
is it not?: https://doc.rust-lang.org/cargo/index.html
if I browse through the contents of /usr/share/doc/cargo-doc, there's
nothing useful at all, unlike /usr/share/doc/rust-doc/ from `rust
6 matches
Mail list logo
