Hello!
Just to follow up on this topic, the riscv64 build on Debian has
worked perfectly since last upload. The builds and test suites have
never run this well ever before for MariaDB 10.5 on so many platforms:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=mariadb-10.5
Thanks Aurelien!
PS. Plea
Hello!
> Can we use the patch I proposed earlier in this bug report? I have
> tested it on riscv64 and it builds. I can do another try with the
> changes from the latest upload and propose a MR on salsa.
Sorry, I somehow missed this. Also other "subscribers" of this bug
missed it since the Debian
Thanks for the tests.
Looks like removing the rocksdb part of the patch was overly ambitious.
Also need atomics on the unittest/mysys/my_atomic-t.c
I've updated:
https://github.com/MariaDB/server/tree/bb-10.3-danielblack-MDEV-23892-pr979
aka
https://github.com/MariaDB/server/commit/6171ecee13ae
On 2020-10-06 21:30, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
> Hello!
>
> ti 6. lokak. 2020 klo 14.41 Otto Kekäläinen (o...@debian.org) kirjoitti:
> >
> > Thanks Daniel!
> >
> > I applied it in
> > https://salsa.debian.org/mariadb-team/mariadb-10.5/-/commit/061acd336f7cdaa16ff0271feafce4a2551ab903
> > and tested o
Hello!
ti 6. lokak. 2020 klo 14.41 Otto Kekäläinen (o...@debian.org) kirjoitti:
>
> Thanks Daniel!
>
> I applied it in
> https://salsa.debian.org/mariadb-team/mariadb-10.5/-/commit/061acd336f7cdaa16ff0271feafce4a2551ab903
> and tested on Launchpad to ensure that it does not at least regress :)
> h
Thanks Daniel!
I applied it in
https://salsa.debian.org/mariadb-team/mariadb-10.5/-/commit/061acd336f7cdaa16ff0271feafce4a2551ab903
and tested on Launchpad to ensure that it does not at least regress :)
https://launchpad.net/~otto/+archive/ubuntu/mariadb/+builds?build_text=&build_state=all
I will
https://jira.mariadb.org/browse/MDEV-23892 created for this issue.
https://github.com/MariaDB/server/pull/979 modified to be more minimal
https://github.com/MariaDB/server/commit/970984e9f9b385d7a64d896baa437a40d65d3f2f
is now in testing.
Comments welcome.
Testing on riscv64 is also very welcome
Hello!
I plan to upload mariadb-10.5 1:10.5.5-2 in a couple of days and I
would be happy to receive merge requests regarding getting riscv64 to
build properly on Debian.
http://bugs.debian.org/933151
https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/MySQL/patches
ti 29. syysk. 2020 klo 16.48 Otto Kekäläinen (o...@
Upstream PR is very welcome.
Occasional nagging also.
Hello!
Adding Christian and Dimitri to the recipients, since I think it was
Dimitri who patched the Ubuntu version of cmake for this.
ti 29. syysk. 2020 klo 0.22 Aurelien Jarno (aurel...@aurel32.net) kirjoitti:
>
> On 2020-09-28 15:12, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
> > After uploading mariadb-10.5 1:10
On 2020-09-28 15:12, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
> After uploading mariadb-10.5 1:10.5.5-1 to Debian the build still
> fails with these:
>
> /usr/bin/ld: /usr/include/c++/10/bits/atomic_base.h:464: undefined
> reference to `__atomic_compare_exchange_1'
>
> The odd thing is that an identical build on U
After uploading mariadb-10.5 1:10.5.5-1 to Debian the build still
fails with these:
/usr/bin/ld: /usr/include/c++/10/bits/atomic_base.h:464: undefined
reference to `__atomic_compare_exchange_1'
The odd thing is that an identical build on Ubuntu Groovy passes OK:
https://launchpadlibrarian.net/499
I'm probably going to add a fix to
https://github.com/MariaDB/server/blob/10.5/configure.cmake#L865 to
include libatomic globally if needed.
AIX needs it too.
On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 7:56 AM Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
>
> Package: mariadb-10.5
> Version: 1:10.5.5-1~exp1
>
> The riscv64 builds on Deb
Package: mariadb-10.5
Version: 1:10.5.5-1~exp1
The riscv64 builds on Debian build are still failing for latest mariadb-105:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=mariadb-10.5&arch=riscv64&ver=1%3A10.5.5-1%7Eexp1&stamp=1599937965&raw=0
[ 62%] Building CXX object
storage/mroo
Hi,
On 2020-08-23 13:39, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
> The new .24 failed on Debian builders now with:
>
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=mariadb-10.3&arch=riscv64&ver=1%3A10.3.24-1&stamp=1598114515&raw=0
>
> cd /<>/builddir/storage/spider &&
> /usr/bin/riscv64-linux-gnu-g++ -DDBUG_T
Hello!
Following up on the MariaDB riscv64 build issue.
In MariaDB 10.3.24 the libatomic on RocksDB patch at
https://github.com/mariadb/server/commit/715beee46abb4c29bffd6f9c5fd5ee95da55bf4f
was applied and thus MariaDB issue
https://jira.mariadb.org/browse/MDEV-23051 was closed.
Conversation wa
Thanks for looking into this!
I would appreciate is some risc expert tested the solution on a risc
builder and eventually filed a MR at
https://salsa.debian.org/mariadb-team/mariadb-10.3 or directly upstream at
github.com/mariadb/server. Filing a PR upstream would be the guaranteed way
to get a Ro
Hi,
On 2019-07-26 22:17, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
> Package: mariadb-10.3
> X-Debbugs-CC: debian-ri...@lists.debian.org
> User: debian-ri...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: riscv64
>
> The version of the package currently FTBFS on the riscv64 port.
>
> From
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.p
Hello,
Missatge de Hector Oron del dia dg., 28 de jul.
2019 a les 1:45:
> The code including atomic must link using `-latomic`, that is
> apparently GCC bug, which it is not often seen in other architectures.
> I have been unable to test the assumption.
>From irc://OFTC/debian-riscv channel some
Hello,
Missatge de Otto Kekäläinen del dia ds., 27 de jul.
2019 a les 3:21:
>
> Package: mariadb-10.3
> X-Debbugs-CC: debian-ri...@lists.debian.org
> User: debian-ri...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: riscv64
>
> The version of the package currently FTBFS on the riscv64 port.
>
> >From
> >https://b
Package: mariadb-10.3
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-ri...@lists.debian.org
User: debian-ri...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: riscv64
The version of the package currently FTBFS on the riscv64 port.
>From
>https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=mariadb-10.3&arch=riscv64&ver=1%3A10.3.16-1&stamp=15612250
21 matches
Mail list logo
