Bug#932989: gcc-avr: Package version severely outdated compared to main gcc-toolchain

Hi, Microchip has updated it's official AVR-toolchain in May 2022 as well and provided related technical details. https://www.microchip.com/en-us/tools-resources/develop/microchip-studio/gcc-compilers Please (at least) port this version into the debian package sources ASAP. Debian seems to ha

Bug#932989: gcc-avr: Package version severely outdated compared to main gcc-toolchain

There is no progress I'm afraid. The package is up for adoption. We need to find someone who's willing to put in the time needed... On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 7:27 PM Marco wrote: > What's the current status? This bug is almost 3 years old and Debian > is still shipping 5.4.0, even in Sid. nightwal

Bug#932989: gcc-avr: Package version severely outdated compared to main gcc-toolchain

What's the current status? This bug is almost 3 years old and Debian is still shipping 5.4.0, even in Sid. nightwalker-87 mentions that Arch Linux may have found a working solution: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=932989#20

Bug#932989: gcc-avr: Package version severely outdated compared to main gcc-toolchain

No worries. Thanx for caring! On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 3:00 PM Gregor Riepl wrote: > Please disregard my last message, I totally missed the whole discussion > that has already been going on. > > Sorry. > -- Håkan Ardö

Bug#1001273: Bug#932989: gcc-avr: Package version severely outdated compared to main gcc-toolchain

I believe your right, and I would support any such efforts. I've orphaned these packages quite some time ago as I've not been able to find the time to implement this myself though. On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 2:03 PM Gregor Riepl wrote: > > >> Switching back to use upstream source would be one optio

Bug#932989: gcc-avr: Package version severely outdated compared to main gcc-toolchain

Please disregard my last message, I totally missed the whole discussion that has already been going on. Sorry.

Bug#932989: gcc-avr: Package version severely outdated compared to main gcc-toolchain

>> Switching back to use upstream source would be one option. But will >> that mean we'll have to dropp support for newer devices? > Unfortunately I don’t know too much about the development history of > this package @Debian and the related decisions. It would be helpful > though to have other d

Bug#932989: gcc-avr: Package version severely outdated compared to main gcc-toolchain

Hi Hakan, pointing to this issue in a developer discussion and also this link (https://savannah.nongnu.org/forum/forum.php?forum_id=8460 ) led to the maintainer Jörg Wunsch. It looks like as if he could be one of the key persons to addr

Bug#932989: gcc-avr: Package version severely outdated compared to main gcc-toolchain

Dear Hakan, Thank You very much for your quick reply. Unfortunately I don’t know too much about the development history of this package @Debian and the related decisions. It would be helpful though to have other developers and maintainers to have their say on this to help find a common solution

Bug#932989: gcc-avr: Package version severely outdated compared to main gcc-toolchain

Hi, gcc-avr was originally built from the mainline gcc, but was later split out by to build depend on gcc-source as it was not wanted in the mainstream gcc package. Has that situation changed? It was then decided to base the package on the Atmel distribution instead of the upstream source as that

Bug#932989: gcc-avr: Package version severely outdated compared to main gcc-toolchain

Package: gcc-avr Version: 1:5.4.0+Atmel3.6.1-2 Severity: normal Tags: newcomer Dear Maintainer, It appears that the gcc-avr toolchain in the debian repository is severely outdated compared to the current level of version support for the main gcc toolchain. This leaves avr-developers wishing to us