On Mon, Jul 01, 2019 at 11:52:42PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Jun 29, 2019 at 10:05:39AM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > On 01-06-2019 22:06, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > > On Wed, 15 May 2019 13:00:52 +0100 Justin B Rye
> > > wrote:
> > >> Daniel Lange wrote:
> >
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 29, 2019 at 10:05:39AM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On 01-06-2019 22:06, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > On Wed, 15 May 2019 13:00:52 +0100 Justin B Rye
> > wrote:
> >> Daniel Lange wrote:
> * reason for removal
> not essential, but it helps to understand the is
Hi all,
On 01-06-2019 22:06, Paul Gevers wrote:
> On Wed, 15 May 2019 13:00:52 +0100 Justin B Rye
> wrote:
>> Daniel Lange wrote:
* reason for removal
not essential, but it helps to understand the issue
>>> #765854
>>> ecryptfs cannot unmount encrypted home directories due to syst
Hi,
On 02-06-2019 12:45, Justin B Rye wrote:
> Holger Wansing wrote:
+The ecryptfs-utils
package
+is not part of buster due to an unfixed serious bug (>>> +url="&url-bts;765854">#765854). At the time of
writing this
>>> paragr
Holger Wansing wrote:
>>> +The ecryptfs-utils
>>> package
>>> +is not part of buster due to an unfixed serious bug (>> +url="&url-bts;765854">#765854). At the time of writing
>>> this
>> paragraph, there was no clear advice for users of encryptfs,
Hi,
Am Sonntag, 2. Juni 2019 schrieb Justin B Rye:
> Paul Gevers wrote:
> > +The ecryptfs-utils
> > package
> > +is not part of buster due to an unfixed serious bug ( > +url="&url-bts;765854">#765854). At the time of writing
> > this
> > +paragraph
Paul Gevers wrote:
> +The ecryptfs-utils
> package
> +is not part of buster due to an unfixed serious bug ( +url="&url-bts;765854">#765854). At the time of writing
> this
> +paragraph, there wasn't a clear advice to people with encryptfs,
> +
Control: tags -1 patch
Hi all,
On Wed, 15 May 2019 13:00:52 +0100 Justin B Rye
wrote:
> Daniel Lange wrote:
> >> * reason for removal
> >> not essential, but it helps to understand the issue
> > #765854
> > ecryptfs cannot unmount encrypted home directories due to systemd keeping
> > the p
Daniel Lange wrote:
>> * reason for removal
>> not essential, but it helps to understand the issue
> #765854
> ecryptfs cannot unmount encrypted home directories due to systemd keeping
> the pam session active even after logout.
> Upstream bug https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/8598
>
Am 14.05.19 um 08:54 schrieb Andrei POPESCU:
* reason for removal
not essential, but it helps to understand the issue
#765854
ecryptfs cannot unmount encrypted home directories due to systemd
keeping the pam session active even after logout.
Upstream bug https://github.com/systemd/system
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On Lu, 13 mai 19, 23:16:40, Daniel Lange wrote:
> Package: release-notes
> Severity: important
>
> Due to #765854 ecryptfs-utils has been removed from Buster.
> The kernel module (ecryptfs.ko) is still built but depending on the upgrade
> path users will be unable to m
Package: release-notes
Severity: important
Due to #765854 ecryptfs-utils has been removed from Buster.
The kernel module (ecryptfs.ko) is still built but depending on the
upgrade path users will be unable to mount their encrypted home
directories (pam module, ecryptfs-mount-private missing).
S
12 matches
Mail list logo
