Bug#926218: range-v3: FTBFS with gcc 8.3

2019-04-26 Thread Коля Гурьев
Alexis Murzeau, thank you very much for the investigation. Then we can ignore that warning in a good conscience. To avoid "unrecognized command line option" errors, I've rewritten the ranges_append_flag macro used by CMake.

Bug#926218: range-v3: FTBFS with gcc 8.3

2019-04-24 Thread Alexis Murzeau
On Wed, 3 Apr 2019 10:18:35 +0200 Santiago Vila wrote: > On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 10:57:39PM +0300, Коля Гурьев wrote: > > Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/ericniebler/range-v3/issues/856 > > Hi. I believe this one (failure with GCC 9) could be a bit closer: > > https://github.com/ericniebl

Bug#926218: range-v3: FTBFS with gcc 8.3

2019-04-03 Thread Santiago Vila
On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 10:57:39PM +0300, Коля Гурьев wrote: > Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/ericniebler/range-v3/issues/856 Hi. I believe this one (failure with GCC 9) could be a bit closer: https://github.com/ericniebler/range-v3/issues/1033 Thanks.

Bug#926218: range-v3: FTBFS with gcc 8.3

2019-04-03 Thread Santiago Vila
On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 10:57:39PM +0300, Коля Гурьев wrote: > Thank you for the report! Which hardware architecture do you use to > build the package? I'm using amd64, nothing special. Are you sure this problem is the same as the one in the "forwarded" issue in github? In case it helps, I've tri

Bug#926218: range-v3: FTBFS with gcc 8.3

2019-04-02 Thread Коля Гурьев
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/ericniebler/range-v3/issues/856 Hi! Thank you for the report! Which hardware architecture do you use to build the package? There is something similar in upstream bug tracker.

Bug#926218: range-v3: FTBFS with gcc 8.3

2019-04-02 Thread Santiago Vila
Package: src:range-v3 Version: 0.4.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Dear maintainer: I tried to build this package in buster but it failed: [...] debian/rules binary-indep dh binary-indep dh_update_autotools_co