Hi!
On 27.05.19 15:02, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 02:18:54PM +0200, Ulrike Uhlig wrote:
>> It would be useful to know with which statements or assumptions you do
>> not agree with and why - so that the discussion may become more
>> productive & helpful.
>
> "cannot be maintai
On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 02:18:54PM +0200, Ulrike Uhlig wrote:
> It would be useful to know with which statements or assumptions you do
> not agree with and why - so that the discussion may become more
> productive & helpful.
"cannot be maintained in stable". I think this can at least be tried.
An
Hi Holger,
On 27.05.19 11:56, Holger Levsen wrote:
> i'm not sure I agree with the assumptions from this bug report but
It would be useful to know with which statements or assumptions you do
not agree with and why - so that the discussion may become more
productive & helpful.
> anyway, i just wa
hi,
i'm not sure I agree with the assumptions from this bug report but
anyway, i just want to point out that 'maintaining tbl in stretch via
stretch-backports' doesnt work because tbl is not in buster and thus, if
this bug gets retitled to 'tbl should not be part of bullseye',
maintaining tbl in b
4 matches
Mail list logo
