Andrei POPESCU wrote:
>> + disable it before the upgrade, to ensure login sessions work on
>> + &releasename;. (A possible route to re-enabling it is outlined on the
>
> Any particular reason for using "&releasename;" instead of "buster"?
>
> At least for me it's easier to read (and und
On Sb, 20 apr 19, 18:40:17, Justin B Rye wrote:
> Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > Justin B Rye wrote:
> >> The "hidepid" mount-options for /proc (as recommended by various
> >
> > Why plural? Both the wiki and proc(5) are using singular.
>
> You're right - I was thinking of "hidepid=0/1/2" as separate
Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> Justin B Rye wrote:
>> The "hidepid" mount-options for /proc (as recommended by various
>
> Why plural? Both the wiki and proc(5) are using singular.
You're right - I was thinking of "hidepid=0/1/2" as separate options,
but yes, the approved terminology is to call it one o
On Ma, 26 mar 19, 18:12:38, Justin B Rye wrote:
>
> The "hidepid" mount-options for /proc (as recommended by various
Why plural? Both the wiki and proc(5) are using singular.
Thanks,
Andrei
--
http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Package: release-notes
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
The "hidepid" mount-options for /proc (as recommended by various
online hardening HOWTOs) work with Stretch but cause problems on
Buster, and are considered an unsupported configuration by systemd
upstream - see #819808, #892585, #897654. So u
5 matches
Mail list logo
