Hi all,
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh dixit:
>On Thu, Oct 1, 2020, at 21:05, Michael Stone wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 11:20:44PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
>> >Michael Stone dixit:
>> >
>> >> you can fix it right now!
>> >
>> >So, what do you mean? Take over the rng-tools package?
>So, as
Hi,
>Yes, I have made it clear in the past that I am happy with any
>transition plan at all, so I was not under the impression that I had to
>write anything...
ah okay, and I missed *that*. Great that we talked about it,
thanks Michael for pointing us out.
>So, feel free to even become the new u
Hello...
On Thu, Oct 1, 2020, at 21:05, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 11:20:44PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> >Michael Stone dixit:
> >
> >> you can fix it right now!
> >
> >So, what do you mean? Take over the rng-tools package?
> >
> >If so, it has a maintainer, you know. hmh
retitle 919893 rng-tools-debian: please take over rng-tools with a proper
transition
thanks
Michael Stone dixit:
> On Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 11:20:44PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
>> Michael Stone dixit:
>>
>>> you can fix it right now!
>>
>> So, what do you mean? Take over the rng-tools package
On Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 11:20:44PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
Michael Stone dixit:
you can fix it right now!
So, what do you mean? Take over the rng-tools package?
If so, it has a maintainer, you know. hmh has been quiet so far.
he's been clear that he's happy for someone to take it ove
Michael Stone dixit:
> you can fix it right now!
So, what do you mean? Take over the rng-tools package?
If so, it has a maintainer, you know. hmh has been quiet so far.
> you keep talking about launchpad, but this is a conversation in debian
> channels
> about a debian package. what ubuntu did
On Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 09:32:47PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
Michael Stone dixit:
So your position is that rng-tools 2-unofficial-mt.14-1+b2 and rng-tools-debian
2-unofficial-mt.14-3 both in buster are completely different codebases?
No, no, no, of course not. I’m talking about sid (and t
Michael Stone dixit:
> So your position is that rng-tools 2-unofficial-mt.14-1+b2 and
> rng-tools-debian
> 2-unofficial-mt.14-3 both in buster are completely different codebases?
No, no, no, of course not. I’m talking about sid (and therefore testing).
Even before the release of buster, rng-too
On Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 05:28:12PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
Michael Stone dixit:
So you could have added whatever you needed to rng-tools and skipped the
unnecessary package...
No, rng-tools is a completely different software.
So your position is that rng-tools 2-unofficial-mt.14-1+b2 a
Michael Stone dixit:
> No, there were also user confusion, duplication of functionality, and
> increased difficulty in future migration.
So, the name, and that we have two packages.
Oh well, it has happened now.
> So you could have added whatever you needed to rng-tools and skipped the
> unneces
On Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 04:51:54PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
Michael Stone dixit:
So the package that shouldn't have existed made it into buster, there's a
ridiculous situation with 3 packages providing essentially the same
functionality with minor differences and no practical way for a use
Michael Stone dixit:
> So the package that shouldn't have existed made it into buster, there's a
> ridiculous situation with 3 packages providing essentially the same
> functionality with minor differences and no practical way for a user to figure
> out which to install, and no movement on fixing
12 matches
Mail list logo
