Bug#917972: transition: openexr

2019-10-04 Thread Matteo F. Vescovi
Hi again! On 2019-09-06 at 10:51 (+02), Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > I don't know if you noticed but ilmbase causes a regression in an > autopkgtest as > noted in [1], which will block its testing migration and thus the two > transitions. Meanwhile, with today upload of OpenImageIO to unstable

Bug#917972: transition: openexr

2019-09-06 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 02/09/2019 17:09, Matteo F. Vescovi wrote: > Hi Jonathan! > > On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 8:07 AM Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: >> Let's go! Might tangle with gegl in the libspiro transition, but we can >> deal with that if it arises. > > Ilmbase and OpenEXR both uploaded to unstable/sid. I don't kno

Bug#917972: transition: openexr

2019-09-02 Thread Matteo F. Vescovi
Hi Jonathan! On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 8:07 AM Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > Let's go! Might tangle with gegl in the libspiro transition, but we can > deal with that if it arises. Ilmbase and OpenEXR both uploaded to unstable/sid. Cheers. -- Matteo F. Vescovi || Debian Developer GnuPG KeyID: 4096

Bug#917972: transition: openexr

2019-09-01 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
Control: tag -1 confirmed On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 02:52:39PM +0200, Matteo F. Vescovi wrote: > So, all FTBFS are not related to Ilmbase/OpenEXR. > Let me know if it's ok to go on with this transition. Let's go! Might tangle with gegl in the libspiro transition, but we can deal with that if it ari

Bug#917972: transition: openexr

2019-08-31 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 02:52:39PM +0200, Matteo F. Vescovi wrote: > > So, all FTBFS are not related to Ilmbase/OpenEXR. > Let me know if it's ok to go on with this transition. Ok, looking good. I'd like to hold off for now and get a few of the transitions in progress out of the way first though.

Bug#917972: transition: openexr

2019-08-27 Thread Matteo F. Vescovi
Hi again! On 2019-08-25 at 14:15 (+01), Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: [...] > Is this transition ready to go? Here are the results for the complete rebuild of reverse dependencies, both for ilmbase and openexr libraries: * aqsis_1.8.2-11 => OK * blender_2.80+dfsg-3 => OK * calligra_1:3.1.0+dfsg-5

Bug#917972: transition: openexr

2019-08-26 Thread Matteo F. Vescovi
Hi! On 2019-08-25 at 14:15 (+01), Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > Is this transition ready to go? I probably need to re-test some of the reverse dependencies. Give me a bunch of days and I'll ping you back with the results. -- Matteo F. Vescovi || Debian Developer GnuPG KeyID: 4096R/0x8062398983B2

Bug#917972: transition: openexr

2019-08-25 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
Hi, On Tue, Jan 01, 2019 at 09:47:43PM +0100, Matteo F. Vescovi wrote: > I'm filing this bug for a new transition of openexr package. > > On January 1st, 2019 a fixed testing-purpose package (2.3.0-4) has been > uploaded to experimental. > > So, following a checklist obtained via 'reverse-depend

Bug#917972: transition: openexr

2019-01-02 Thread Matteo F. Vescovi
Hi! This is a follow-up with an update on packages involved in the transition. On 2019-01-01 at 21:47 (+01), Matteo F. Vescovi wrote: > ### Dependency level 2 ### > [...] > * openimageio_1.8.15~dfsg0-1 => FTBFS This is 'openimageio_2.0.3~dfsg0-3' now. Gonna test it later today. > [...] > ##

Bug#917972: transition: openexr

2019-01-01 Thread Matteo F. Vescovi
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-phototools-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org, ma...@debian.org Dear Release Team, I'm filing this bug for a new transition of openexr package. On January 1st, 2019 a fixed