[Richard Laager]
> I don't think that's desirable. If this is actually required, then
> wouldn't every package trying to support systemd and sysvinit need to
> do that same?
I doubt it. It would most likely only affect packages starting very
eary in the boot, (think rcS.d scripts), which are in
TBH I personally think clever conditional logic in the package install for
if (systemd installed) { systemd scripts, sysvinit scripts get
diverted to /dev/null }
elsif (sysvinit for real) { install sysvinit scripts, divert systemd
scripts to /dev/null }
else { print that you're doing neither
On 12/31/18 6:34 PM, Rich wrote:
> It seems like what we might want is an OR dependency on two child
> zfs-{systemd,sysvinit} packages - and for those two packages to
> conflict with each other (and require the appropriate respective init
> packages)?
I don't think that's desirable. If this is act
-- Forwarded message -
From: Rich
Date: Mon, Dec 31, 2018 at 8:16 AM
Subject: Re: zfsutils-linux: Upgrading to 0.7.12 breaks during dpkg --configure
To: Mo Zhou
Heh. It being installed was not, AFAIK, a deliberate choice.
Attempting to remove it, though, looks...frought.
$ sud
4 matches
Mail list logo
