Hi Patrick,
On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 12:28:06PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi Patrick,
>
> On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 11:19:03AM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > Control: notfixed -1 4.1.5-1
> >
> > Hi Patrick,
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 10:52:53AM +0100, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
Hi Patrick,
On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 11:19:03AM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Control: notfixed -1 4.1.5-1
>
> Hi Patrick,
>
> On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 10:52:53AM +0100, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
> > fixed #912997 4.1.5-1
> [...]
> >
> > If I see it correct, there is no issue open here?
>
>
Control: notfixed -1 4.1.5-1
Hi Patrick,
On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 10:52:53AM +0100, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
> fixed #912997 4.1.5-1
[...]
>
> If I see it correct, there is no issue open here?
Don't think this is correct. For instance just take CVE-2018-14661,
this is still unresolved in 4.1.5-1 a
fixed #912997 4.1.5-1
thanks
Hi
Am 05.11.2018 um 19:09 schrieb Markus Koschany:
> Package: glusterfs
> X-Debbugs-CC: t...@security.debian.org
> Severity: grave
> Tags: security
>
> Hi,
>
> The following vulnerabilities were published for glusterfs.
>
> CVE-2018-14651[0]:
> | It was found that th
Package: glusterfs
X-Debbugs-CC: t...@security.debian.org
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Hi,
The following vulnerabilities were published for glusterfs.
CVE-2018-14651[0]:
| It was found that the fix for CVE-2018-10927, CVE-2018-10928,
| CVE-2018-10929, CVE-2018-10930, and CVE-2018-10926 was inc
5 matches
Mail list logo