Gtk2 support and gtk2 for Perl shouldn't be removed. Lots of users
depend on it and GTK3 is not a replacement or viable upgrade path from
gtk2. It doesn't do the same things, it uses significantly more
resources, it's incredibly more buggy, and it puts a dependence on
redhatisms. It is also very po
olly just nicely explained me on IRC a few things about the
autoremoval machinery and how it affects removing from testing
libgtk2-perl and its reverse-dependencies:
- A set of RC buggy packages that have no reverse-deps outside of
this set, should all be autoremoved together at some point, as
Hi,
intrigeri:
> I've filed bug reports against all reverse dependencies (normal
> severity for now), tracked using the gtk2-removal usertag
Since then, one new reverse dependency appeared in the archive
(libcircle-fe-gtk-perl), against which I've also filed a bug.
I intend to make all these bug
I've filed bug reports against all reverse dependencies (normal
severity for now), tracked using the gtk2-removal usertag:
https://udd.debian.org/cgi-bin/bts-usertags.cgi?tag=gtk2-removal&user=debian-perl%40lists.debian.org
All reverse dependencies are leaf packages. The vast majority are
either
Source: libgtk2-perl
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: jbi...@debian.org
User: debian-p...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: gtk2-removal
User: pkg-gnome-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: oldlibs
The Debian GNOME Maintainers are working to reduce GTK+ 2 usage in
Debian. GTK+ 3 has been declar
5 matches
Mail list logo
