Hi Bernhard, AppArmor folks and bystanders,
intrigeri:
> All this is doable but requires quite more work (and risks) than
> I thought initially.
> I'm starting to think that it would be vastly easier to do that via
> autopkgtests: […]
It's unfortunately too late to get all this done in time for
Bernhard Schmidt:
> It would be great if dh-apparmor could check the basic syntax
> of the AppArmor policy included in the package and abort the build.
I've thought a bit more about it and I see a few issues with this
proposal:
1. dh-apparmor will need a dependency on apparmor, so that
apparmo
Control: retitle -1 dh-apparmor should check syntax of AppArmor policy at
package build time
Hi,
Bernhard Schmidt:
> I'm not sure whether this is possible.
> There have been multiple occasions (and I have been the cause of at least one
> of them) where a syntactically wrong AppArmor policy (mis
Package: dh-apparmor
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
I'm not sure whether this is possible. If not feel free to close.
There have been multiple occasions (and I have been the cause of at least one
of them) where a syntactically wrong AppArmor policy (missing comma at EOL)
caused an RC bug. It would be gr
4 matches
Mail list logo
