Hi Antonio,
On 08/01/2018 02:01 PM, Antonio Diaz Diaz wrote:
> It seems I answered to the wrong bug, sorry.
no problem :)
> The bug fixed in zutils-1.8-pre2 also fixes this one (#904819).
yes, I was going to clean that up, but had to leave (it's closed now).
> Thank you very much Daniel for ex
On Tue, 31 Jul 2018 10:58:41 +0800 Ben Hutchings wrote:
*** Error in `zcat': free(): invalid next size (normal): 0x016e6980 ***
It seems I answered to the wrong bug[1], sorry. The bug fixed in
zutils-1.8-pre2 also fixes this one (#904819).
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrepor
On Mon, 2018-07-30 at 19:43 +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> On 07/30/2018 06:39 PM, Antonio Diaz Diaz wrote:
> > A double-free bug in zutils' zcat is not probable [...]
>
> Thank you for your explenation, Antonio.
>
> Ben, do you agree that I'll merge #904819 and #903931 again?
No, I do not. The
On 07/30/2018 06:39 PM, Antonio Diaz Diaz wrote:
> A double-free bug in zutils' zcat is not probable [...]
Thank you for your explenation, Antonio.
Ben, do you agree that I'll merge #904819 and #903931 again?
Regards,
Daniel
On Sat, 28 Jul 2018 17:57:54 +0800 Ben Hutchings wrote:
The double-free bug in zutils zcat is presumably still unfixed, so I'm
cloning a separate bug for that.
A double-free bug in zutils' zcat is not probable because zutils' zcat
is a C++ program that does not use neither malloc nor free. But
5 matches
Mail list logo