Bug#903530: pyresample FTBFS with Python 3.7 as supported version

2018-07-12 Thread Chris Lamb
Adrian, > Please give a signed answer whether you as DPL consider both the > contents and the quantity of these statements appropriate for > "working together as a team" in Debian. You asked me to this thread to resolve a potential conflict, yet you now appear to be escalating one directly with

Bug#903530: pyresample FTBFS with Python 3.7 as supported version

2018-07-11 Thread Adrian Bunk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 12:42:09PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote: > Adrian, Chris, > > This is not the first time that you are blaming me for submitting > > FTBFS bugs, but it is not required for the submitter to state more > > than the error message (wh

Bug#903530: pyresample FTBFS with Python 3.7 as supported version

2018-07-11 Thread Chris Lamb
Adrian, > This is not the first time that you are blaming me for submitting > FTBFS bugs, but it is not required for the submitter to state more > than the error message (which I did) - it is the maintainer who > is supposed to debug problems. This might be true but in Debian aren't we trying to

Bug#903530: pyresample FTBFS with Python 3.7 as supported version

2018-07-11 Thread Adrian Bunk
[ DPL added to Cc, requesting conflict resolution ] On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 10:32:22AM +0200, Bas Couwenberg wrote: >... > Your bugreports are filed blindly, without taking ongoing transitions in > consideration. >... This is factually incorrect, and you knew after my previous email. > And your

Bug#903530: pyresample FTBFS with Python 3.7 as supported version

2018-07-11 Thread Bas Couwenberg
Control: tags -1 pending Control: block -1 by 902582 On 2018-07-11 10:22, Adrian Bunk wrote: On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 06:54:58AM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: Filing this bug is very premature, no, it is not. Yes, it is. As long as the build dependencies haven't been rebuilt/fixed, py

Bug#903530: pyresample FTBFS with Python 3.7 as supported version

2018-07-11 Thread Adrian Bunk
Control: reopen -1 Control: severity -1 On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 06:54:58AM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > notfound 903530 pyresample/1.9.3-2 > severity 903530 important > thanks > > Hi Adrian, Hi Bas, > Filing this bug is very premature, no, it is not. > the Python 3.7 transition is st

Bug#903530: pyresample FTBFS with Python 3.7 as supported version

2018-07-10 Thread Adrian Bunk
Source: pyresample Version: 1.9.3-2 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/pyresample.html ... creating build/temp.linux-amd64-3.7 creating build/temp.linux-amd64-3.7/pyresample creating build/temp.linux-amd64-3.7/pyresample/ewa x86_64-lin