Bug#898969: dnssec-trigger: fails with OpenSSL in experimental due to too-small key

2018-10-02 Thread brian m. carlson
On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 08:06:25PM -0700, Diane Trout wrote: > On Mon, 2018-10-01 at 20:23 +0200, Lee Garrett wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Any update on this bug? dnssec-trigger will be autoremoved due to > > this bug > > tomorrow. I'd like to see it in buster, though. > > > > Ooops I forgot, Also do

Bug#898969: dnssec-trigger: fails with OpenSSL in experimental due to too-small key

2018-10-01 Thread Diane Trout
On Mon, 2018-10-01 at 20:23 +0200, Lee Garrett wrote: > Hi, > > Any update on this bug? dnssec-trigger will be autoremoved due to > this bug > tomorrow. I'd like to see it in buster, though. Ooops I forgot, Also does this bug impact unbound? I tried checking the unbound maintainer scripts and t

Bug#898969: dnssec-trigger: fails with OpenSSL in experimental due to too-small key

2018-10-01 Thread Lee Garrett
Hi, Any update on this bug? dnssec-trigger will be autoremoved due to this bug tomorrow. I'd like to see it in buster, though. Regards, Lee

Bug#898969: dnssec-trigger: fails with OpenSSL in experimental due to too-small key

2018-05-17 Thread Diane Trout
Thank you for the detailed bug report. I'll need to think a bit about the maintainer script... On Fri, 2018-05-18 at 01:27 +, brian m. carlson wrote: > Package: dnssec-trigger > Version: 0.15+repack-1 > Severity: important > > I have two existing installations of dnssec-trigger that have 1

Bug#898969: dnssec-trigger: fails with OpenSSL in experimental due to too-small key

2018-05-17 Thread brian m. carlson
Package: dnssec-trigger Version: 0.15+repack-1 Severity: important I have two existing installations of dnssec-trigger that have 1536-bit client and server keys. I'm using the OpenSSL from experimental, which rejects keys of less than 2048 bits in size, as they are presently considered too weak.